Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE2BB1A9126;
 Thu,  7 Jan 2016 09:49:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id dLjUlMNMcort; Thu,  7 Jan 2016 09:49:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD19B1A9125;
 Thu,  7 Jan 2016 09:49:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.10] (cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4])
 (authenticated bits=0)
 by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id u07HnZvg031121
 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
 Thu, 7 Jan 2016 11:49:36 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host
 cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4] claimed to be [10.0.1.10]
From: "Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com>
To: "S Moonesamy" <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:49:36 -0600
Message-ID: <C212021F-D3C1-4D61-8388-593E6D8FCE26@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20160107091507.0e9b10d0@elandnews.com>
References: <20160106231543.12304.75202.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
 <6.2.5.6.2.20160107091507.0e9b10d0@elandnews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.3r5187)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/imapext/89xWgGW2s_O6XKCSMsI9_Fm-e38>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 09:57:35 -0800
Cc: draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension@ietf.org,
 The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, imapext@ietf.org, imapapnd-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [imapext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on
 draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions <imapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imapext>,
 <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/imapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:imapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext>,
 <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 17:49:47 -0000

On 7 Jan 2016, at 11:18, S Moonesamy wrote:

> Hi Ben,
> At 15:15 06-01-2016, Ben Campbell wrote:
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> - section 2, last paragraph:
>>
>> It was not obvious to me if "An IMAP client SHOULD be able to parse 
>> both
>> formats. " meant both STATUS and LIST, or both global and 
>> per-mailbox. I
>> assume the former.
>
> OLD
> An IMAP client SHOULD be able to parse both formats.
> END
>
> NEW
> An IMAP client implementing this extension should be able to parse 
> both
> mailbox-specific and global APPENDLIMIT responses.
> END


Works for me. (And shows I assumed wrong.)

>
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy (as document shepherd)

