IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [imapext] Fwd: Request to form a new WG: JMAP

Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> Mon, 07 November 2016 19:36 UTC

Return-Path: <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA3F312985D; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 11:36:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gulbrandsen.priv.no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N5VA287-c2JM; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 11:36:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from strange.aox.org (strange.aox.org [IPv6:2001:4d88:100c::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 441D6129695; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 11:36:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by strange.aox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F46CFA0044; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 19:36:35 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gulbrandsen.priv.no; s=mail; t=1478547395; bh=RvGFm8vGxW8mkGQthe8jXqEIz2m9nOe/NBDbhe9m0OY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=FdO/a79Y7c2VPJg+9rUqbgO/jT3cekssoFYkl0jga/ho88f3Uku2fmKrCgBbgeou4 D6ezBsdSPebLtCic/degFbvpPU8lvVabLqQIghTb0bVtt40OUk24/cM6OYDdnOzck7 +FJxUD7xrQViN7jcIoJHsGVt/4ADpGjd22So31tY=
Received: from arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no by fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Archiveopteryx 3.2.0) with esmtpsa id 1478547394-15162-15881/11/4; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 19:36:34 +0000
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 19:36:33 +0000
User-Agent: Trojita/v0.5-9-g8961725; Qt/4.8.6; X11; Linux; Debian GNU/Linux 8.6 (jessie)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a18f13ab-b846-4048-91a7-6522365bb661@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
In-Reply-To: <a786d82d-7134-c7bc-24ef-5dfb56e7bbac@isode.com>
References: <1478539079.1706686.780110457.75B1F9CF@webmail.messagingengine.com> <a786d82d-7134-c7bc-24ef-5dfb56e7bbac@isode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/imapext/CVcj25OEGMKAwbGC2bxYaYJjU88>
Cc: ietf-smtp@ietf.org, imapext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [imapext] Fwd: Request to form a new WG: JMAP
X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions <imapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/imapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:imapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 19:36:40 -0000

My two cents: Interesting in principle but it has to be compatible with 
what gmail is doing. If the world's biggest site implements one protocol 
and an RFC specifies another, the RFC is forgotten.

Remember the old motto, rough consensus and running code.

Arnt

v2.19.0 | Report a Bug | By Email