IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [imapext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-08: (with COMMENT)

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Thu, 07 January 2016 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF921A901E; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 07:47:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F72Hu7lHuauB; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 07:47:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BED91A9009; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 07:47:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.226.208.165]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u07Fl4Vu027490 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 7 Jan 2016 07:47:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1452181639; x=1452268039; bh=NTDlRwfTbjeNnjSgihithAI575TzJwCiof9hz6QYWjM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=tJ5P+xspGW1725zmvgfAWPvfTI8v0Hbm+YRRdp3pVpNEBEmV+8HCz1o3u4T1/2CAT aUIN8mTVPpk9ZsGlI7hAb2BjHQfqWl/aGNYrR2rgilYR4GY0Cgaoxj5CD4TVuvaf6f 1AiCA1IcMXm7gEmIAL/XA3BPV9HiJF5h79rCPmwY=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1452181639; x=1452268039; i=@elandsys.com; bh=NTDlRwfTbjeNnjSgihithAI575TzJwCiof9hz6QYWjM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=fJI4sHjiiJcG9la3MPqzBENCZ5cTzOcqdjhoK56AcUubScK3ru6u4QaWJ7NMcLruZ UlaCwF5PLBpuRWlRxZGsv6uN2GxKoLpw3gVdB6oHm9AIgsy1BkdeEJDQrq0uuFxktQ D7K4oOt2YAPUVY88gAzVggQzFociWfxyEagEVpgY=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20160107073744.0dc4b108@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 07:46:50 -0800
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160106231543.12304.75202.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20160106231543.12304.75202.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/imapext/HEyn-MhPDTyOqw0LM4-xrQ-iaKU>
Cc: draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension@ietf.org, imapext@ietf.org, imapapnd-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [imapext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions <imapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/imapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:imapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 15:47:22 -0000

Hi Ben,
At 15:15 06-01-2016, Ben Campbell wrote:
>The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension/
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>COMMENT:
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>- section 2, last paragraph:
>
>It was not obvious to me if "An IMAP client SHOULD be able to parse both
>formats. " meant both STATUS and LIST, or both global and per-mailbox. I
>assume the former.

Thanks for the review.  I am waiting for a reply from the authors.

I previously commented that the "both formats" would be covered by 
the ABNF (Section 5).  The normative language in that sentence is 
incorrect though [1].

Regards,
S. Moonesamy (as document shepherd)

1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/imapext/current/msg05633.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email