Re: [imapext] WGLC for draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-02

Jayantheesh S B <> Wed, 10 February 2016 15:25 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E490B1B2BDD for <>; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 07:25:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.5
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09ldGiV3WY2v for <>; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 07:25:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A681B2BD4 for <>; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 07:25:42 -0800 (PST)
From: Jayantheesh S B <>
To: S Moonesamy <>, "" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: [imapext] WGLC for draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-02
Thread-Index: AQHRYFJLefKm//RnxkaiYA8SdKsMh58lbKiw
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 15:25:40 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received-SPF: none
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [imapext] WGLC for draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-02
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 15:25:49 -0000

This version of document looks fine for me.  

I see text "non-synchronizing" is not mentioned consistent across the document.
Some places its mentioned as "non- synchronizing" and in some place I see "non synchronizing".

Also I see To Do section in the document with below text.

"Exact semantics of LITERAL- is still in flux."

This section can be removed once if the semantics has been defined. 

-----Original Message-----
From: imapext [] On Behalf Of S Moonesamy
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2016 3:17 PM
Subject: [imapext] WGLC for draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-02


This message starts a Working Group Last Call for "IMAP4 non-synchronizing literals" (draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-02).  The I-D can be accessed at

This Working Group Last Call will end on Saturday 20th February.  Please review the I-D and send comments to the mailing list.

S. Moonesamy (as imapapdb WG Chair)

imapext mailing list