IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [imapext] Review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-03

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 02 March 2016 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DDA81A8940 for <imapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 07:38:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.796
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.796 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dYgJafjW7sya for <imapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 07:38:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 763E31A892A for <imapext@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 07:38:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.227.81.145]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u22Fc5Tt014943 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Mar 2016 07:38:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1456933096; x=1457019496; bh=/pRleu0VeszsSL9hT8+llp3B8EJyfJrSSUjBz0MLEFI=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=VhMSPc9bHh5HERdpCkz9Si/zYayplNnHj3w8gxS3i3Dam5bzvxbSGLjzRuwebpGFi R5ryXlgAHy8M3H9kAqzQW4r5jU4El+ZnDAWNPL2arPz9mnAS+C3z5dTIqtQcBAJZmy 5QEfGsyW/38VA/eRBbIzOh3OWrkrfVxbYD5Z2WTg=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1456933096; x=1457019496; i=@elandsys.com; bh=/pRleu0VeszsSL9hT8+llp3B8EJyfJrSSUjBz0MLEFI=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=HkoO/RyQfjGtkom3GTySU2Fn+iDct2l3KvYe4jNHqcsZXs4e9aKQm9SEC0TmL5mDk YsTwnZTGTAeLzFaYJBQDBzIFkBf7JZ+QQgc2XjrAdDT8iqCFQUr7SE+zMMjrlTbvOB tQM9zD2qo5qNuGrZVWvwjiXvFzugT1k8AE4PP53k=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20160302073625.0e6d5f70@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 07:37:47 -0800
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, imapext@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <56D706CD.3040401@isode.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20160301215244.0d624dc0@elandnews.com> <56D6F347.6010007@isode.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20160302065932.0e6d77c8@elandnews.com> <56D706CD.3040401@isode.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/imapext/RPTzH0B1h7ytlrfrCaEZxJUODe8>
Subject: Re: [imapext] Review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-03
X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions <imapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/imapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:imapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 15:38:18 -0000

Hi Alexey,
At 07:29 02-03-2016, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>IMHO, it is an implementation choice, so use of MAY is appropriate.

I am okay with that.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email