Re: [imapext] [ietf-smtp] Fwd: Request to form a new WG: JMAP

Doug Royer <> Tue, 15 November 2016 00:23 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B50F129479; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xrfWdYYCbNTd; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B915A129431; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id q124so156066171itd.1; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=1Ow7i3sJwI58iRMTMZbg9+p8016K4wF/Lxvwj9TNz9Q=; b=EPA07It2KC1mtqH7+Dv3nhDEvhf+qGNwSJBUKwwAKm1ls9e9bwhy3IcR8xLBIv/+gq aVLhaRk4vVuxmydgcIpwSIPFengk1Hx3gD+8kafQ/jQ4lGjuDtJiRjVvSWLaGQVqZxO3 dgLQSF9VNlwYQnpHtC/y04kVZ2qSNxfwSKUDP5uWzyr4QpFgt+n30NU5AVD1LqNlBgxs DEg99JfKlJXyvFMb9tzxwYNW9Z8lXdIsYUKCcKFFUTMH79YNEH5ZZDVy3dIivOcv5Lxl PIP3TcXitffG+j4crQrfEXzrzYIqkdUbz1LA5ksuIEDMXxPtxPB8EVQsBisFrXHkMjwe h0ow==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=1Ow7i3sJwI58iRMTMZbg9+p8016K4wF/Lxvwj9TNz9Q=; b=Da8IF14uIXZ/2LN9L27f1B1zrdw2PzJOuk31WddsOMZLOJFfhd7MCL9KwAr5BTAG1j JYQr2VdmNCTken53feyqd1o73aEDtMlmhrMJPyprElsFsAVpF6j7ucH0QKs6n996Ibsn ubihqrFVlxuYQ+d2nT989PKVmae7i6ddbNUvETtk41ualkohBik85WRbWkWDLfU+wd5G ZUu9Dn2jEnbNWkRjpBXw9bCAE6CIMDQ6ExszL6mEOF145QwDQ74Q4RHz78CsIdQKQbAr mSDr/7SDyf/2Jyg2dV+yNDE4R/QqzKT6AkFmfBYwPv/fbF4ZHnulGvJs76rt+YmdmYVc athw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdOaIZEVt8JzfgWGWf63kggygHSW5SqN8RAkWEWZnZNLYypAqSNuI/juvRERj+2iw==
X-Received: by with SMTP id v68mr9710811oif.71.1479169430877; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] ([]) by with ESMTPSA id g8sm7376776otc.10.2016. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:50 -0800 (PST)
To:, "''" <>
References: <> <> <56DA516EAC53C07E3F453BA6@JcK-HP8200> <> <> <5F4EE3F805C40EF25D1E0E57@JcK-HP8200> <>
From: Doug Royer <>
Organization: http://SoftwareAndServices.NET
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 17:23:48 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/43.0 SeaMonkey/2.40
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms040907070200070201040702"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [imapext] [ietf-smtp] Fwd: Request to form a new WG: JMAP
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:23:53 -0000

 > (lots of stuff ...)

Ned: YES - YES.

I have felt that way for years.

In response to to Ted's concerns about off-line.

I use SeaMonkey (a Thunderbird spin) for my email. When I setup a mail 
account with it, one of the options is for it to cache the email account 
for offline usage.

I would think this is mostly a client issue. In a future protocol, when 
checking for new message data, pull all of the summary data, and 
optionally all of the body parts. Its a client issue. Save the data, or 
not. If you pull it all, then the client is free to save it, or not.


Doug Royer - (http://DougRoyer.US)