IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [imapext] [ietf-smtp] Fwd: Request to form a new WG: JMAP

Doug Royer <douglasroyer@gmail.com> Tue, 15 November 2016 00:23 UTC

Return-Path: <douglasroyer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B50F129479; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xrfWdYYCbNTd; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it0-x22d.google.com (mail-it0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B915A129431; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id q124so156066171itd.1; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=1Ow7i3sJwI58iRMTMZbg9+p8016K4wF/Lxvwj9TNz9Q=; b=EPA07It2KC1mtqH7+Dv3nhDEvhf+qGNwSJBUKwwAKm1ls9e9bwhy3IcR8xLBIv/+gq aVLhaRk4vVuxmydgcIpwSIPFengk1Hx3gD+8kafQ/jQ4lGjuDtJiRjVvSWLaGQVqZxO3 dgLQSF9VNlwYQnpHtC/y04kVZ2qSNxfwSKUDP5uWzyr4QpFgt+n30NU5AVD1LqNlBgxs DEg99JfKlJXyvFMb9tzxwYNW9Z8lXdIsYUKCcKFFUTMH79YNEH5ZZDVy3dIivOcv5Lxl PIP3TcXitffG+j4crQrfEXzrzYIqkdUbz1LA5ksuIEDMXxPtxPB8EVQsBisFrXHkMjwe h0ow==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=1Ow7i3sJwI58iRMTMZbg9+p8016K4wF/Lxvwj9TNz9Q=; b=Da8IF14uIXZ/2LN9L27f1B1zrdw2PzJOuk31WddsOMZLOJFfhd7MCL9KwAr5BTAG1j JYQr2VdmNCTken53feyqd1o73aEDtMlmhrMJPyprElsFsAVpF6j7ucH0QKs6n996Ibsn ubihqrFVlxuYQ+d2nT989PKVmae7i6ddbNUvETtk41ualkohBik85WRbWkWDLfU+wd5G ZUu9Dn2jEnbNWkRjpBXw9bCAE6CIMDQ6ExszL6mEOF145QwDQ74Q4RHz78CsIdQKQbAr mSDr/7SDyf/2Jyg2dV+yNDE4R/QqzKT6AkFmfBYwPv/fbF4ZHnulGvJs76rt+YmdmYVc athw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdOaIZEVt8JzfgWGWf63kggygHSW5SqN8RAkWEWZnZNLYypAqSNuI/juvRERj+2iw==
X-Received: by 10.202.197.71 with SMTP id v68mr9710811oif.71.1479169430877; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.4] ([65.129.4.217]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g8sm7376776otc.10.2016.11.14.16.23.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:23:50 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-smtp@ietf.org, "'imapext@ietf.org'" <imapext@ietf.org>
References: <1478539079.1706686.780110457.75B1F9CF@webmail.messagingengine.com> <a786d82d-7134-c7bc-24ef-5dfb56e7bbac@isode.com> <56DA516EAC53C07E3F453BA6@JcK-HP8200> <58220833.4000806@gmail.com> <01Q73SYPHLDI011H9Q@mauve.mrochek.com> <5F4EE3F805C40EF25D1E0E57@JcK-HP8200> <01Q7B16YQ1IO011H9Q@mauve.mrochek.com>
From: Doug Royer <douglasroyer@gmail.com>
Organization: http://SoftwareAndServices.NET
Message-ID: <582A5594.5080008@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 17:23:48 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/43.0 SeaMonkey/2.40
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <01Q7B16YQ1IO011H9Q@mauve.mrochek.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms040907070200070201040702"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/imapext/_dMn4p5pUdVUBO947Hh3BAylzfo>
Subject: Re: [imapext] [ietf-smtp] Fwd: Request to form a new WG: JMAP
X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions <imapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/imapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:imapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:23:53 -0000

 > (lots of stuff ...)

Ned: YES - YES.

I have felt that way for years.

In response to to Ted's concerns about off-line.

I use SeaMonkey (a Thunderbird spin) for my email. When I setup a mail 
account with it, one of the options is for it to cache the email account 
for offline usage.

I would think this is mostly a client issue. In a future protocol, when 
checking for new message data, pull all of the summary data, and 
optionally all of the body parts. Its a client issue. Save the data, or 
not. If you pull it all, then the client is free to save it, or not.


-- 

Doug Royer - (http://DougRoyer.US)
DouglasRoyer@gmail.com
714-989-6135

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email