IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [imapext] FW: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-07

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 29 December 2015 00:02 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB3AC1ACDF2; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 16:02:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 43w4ppkk3ceg; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 16:02:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2F51ACDFB; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 16:02:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.227.83.149]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tBT02AUO009670 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 28 Dec 2015 16:02:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1451347344; x=1451433744; bh=goW22PyinfE8Z8of0B5n1Pflc38MQe7Oh6VEZ9ObdN8=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=rMuwaOsyf93/QRTSCa2CqXhRG9DM1cbXIVORG8x6FG69cvuV0Pm86owvJZSzwuU1h pKsxTk5Mb11tEIErbV47Y7DYiAnUyNi75humS95ZiXfgZUBefu8GN4bRZ+KGdY29Ts dF2buaGQo+Uedxv4QNRhc5qnn3/iwsMU223Y259M=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1451347344; x=1451433744; i=@elandsys.com; bh=goW22PyinfE8Z8of0B5n1Pflc38MQe7Oh6VEZ9ObdN8=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=jqul/HLmrf9Ay19hucrfIIltXYnAkthMGS3TkgnEinv3Sn+KhxQBvd921xUB+j2q4 CXjHgdDuTeCtLEZE2WkqfSLAARmHpf+PWpxO8LtcomyTnvhu3Aq8kTCxwaR4KBg9Rt 0fhJ6dukvKPmlBFfuAu6ec35V2okptQOCdessmjw=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20151228155242.0cd85dd0@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 16:01:46 -0800
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Jayantheesh S B <j.sb@sea.samsung.com>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJKPQ0VNDV8QYqY-duXGkggaK7pA8gzJ2spT6cP+9SrKrg@mail.g mail.com>
References: <027701d140e4$c1337070$439a5150$@akayla.com> <028001d140e9$565a4850$030ed8f0$@akayla.com> <CALaySJK1_TG7Gzgc4YrqLWfTm_uYQOK0LorcD5NFyL+RoJ0i7w@mail.gmail.com> <ab85929428af4712a27dc35e14c76363@SEAMBX01.sea.samsung.com> <d70ab6f1207a42389ab9affcbc06b9c4@SEAMBX01.sea.samsung.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20151228153852.0cd85b40@elandnews.com> <CALaySJKPQ0VNDV8QYqY-duXGkggaK7pA8gzJ2spT6cP+9SrKrg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/imapext/_ijFf8SwwNyEsAaDbyOZgERTU8c>
Cc: draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension.all@ietf.org, Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com>, imapext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [imapext] FW: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-07
X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions <imapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/imapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:imapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 00:02:31 -0000

Hi Barry,
At 15:51 28-12-2015, Barry Leiba wrote:
>I'll leave the decision to SM, as the document shepherd, but it's
>always my preference to post new versions any time they're ready.
>With the datatracker, reviewers can always get the latest version, and
>I see no confusion caused by updates.  I think waiting is unnecessary,
>and why should people be continuing to review an old version?

I'll go through the new version in a few hours.  If you are okay with 
it before that, I am okay with posting the new version.

It's simpler for the authors if I follow the AD's preference. :-)

Peter, thanks for flagging up the ABNF issue.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy (as document shepherd)

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status