Re: [imapext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5524 (6214)

Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com> Wed, 24 June 2020 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <eburger@standardstrack.com>
X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7A13A0FE5; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:10:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.688
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.688 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=standardstrack.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6AlMam1itrfc; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:10:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from se2b-iad1.servconfig.com (se2b-iad1.servconfig.com [23.235.198.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 640133A0F74; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:10:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from biz221.inmotionhosting.com ([192.145.239.201]) by se2-iad1.servconfig.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <eburger@standardstrack.com>) id 1jo7yR-000BpL-IG; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 12:10:17 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=standardstrack.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:To:From: In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Message-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:References:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=e0zO/3VpQ6hwGh1SKsy3OEGp954uCgzqOwVPtfHG8A0=; b=Z3pbGUx9PInSS9TO91kjadqvdY igsq6j1tSxwBuY7Ys8hWEHgvxXJhDYILcmCv7wzduA+7kUcbnVFKnoIGrkllink3M67KgE+wOCOvY 7zk4i8k+THh/6KKC2GINgJraTB4NjsiYw/qFkWnC7QXfag+8+NkpS5aaj0KiHDhM/2Cg=;
Received: from [68.100.101.142] (port=40174 helo=[192.168.10.41]) by biz221.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <eburger@standardstrack.com>) id 1jo7yP-00FBwA-Dl; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:10:05 -0700
SavedFromEmail: eburger@standardstrack.com
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 12:10:05 -0400
In-Reply-To: <785dde74-0f98-b843-db13-9cf5073925ac@isode.com>
Importance: normal
From: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, Дилян Палаузов <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org>, imapext <imapext@ietf.org>
Cc: lemonade@ietf.org, Cridland Dave <dave@cridland.net>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Parsons Glenn <glenn.parsons@ericsson.com>, Leiba Barry <barryleiba@computer.org>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--_com.samsung.android.email_3455832826354590"
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz221.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: eburger+standardstrack.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
X-Authenticated-Sender: biz221.inmotionhosting.com: eburger@standardstrack.com
Message-ID: <E1jo7yR-000BpL-IG@se2-iad1.servconfig.com>
X-Originating-IP: 192.145.239.201
X-SpamExperts-Domain: biz221.inmotionhosting.com
X-SpamExperts-Username: 192.145.239.201
Authentication-Results: servconfig.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=192.145.239.201@biz221.inmotionhosting.com
X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: ham
X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.08)
X-Recommended-Action: accept
X-Filter-ID: Mvzo4OR0dZXEDF/gcnlw0f6LF1GdvkEexklpcFpSF5apSDasLI4SayDByyq9LIhVvoAnf0Ilz9tc uZskS7enSkTNWdUk1Ol2OGx3IfrIJKyP9eGNFz9TW9u+Jt8z2T3KoiL3cAr8eGmZD6prrk3nHeBg gniDXpufWzjXXWjxBDJv8H3h7/DTT2qx0S1KlKbDJwmPHMaYJ3Lh/cYfxcnQMe7DG2RPfOZUdfZ0 r64H78B9iN/Ft8OKPJ82fSLHDxhQZPrwnsa+CJD8gmfZZKoCLAAC7naKaS8H1/wO4MtVPZMb0lQZ b51w4wLQOv9f8FW1ghuGu3hzm/5PPQbnxkMKlneSxN975I5N1ZNL/AAw14xVRP202uILclkqfq3H yMHiSHE8zu+0wOY9b2Ncza9uIFd9KFK6FThJqwCD8tiBXVtHphJeMajp8sUkqpvAVG6uDg2zVC3N UEJfp3hjQ8ClxMOXQpVXfoOicgE/qqubDkdmh7NUQUw1+KA0zRCxb4//+EliVWdHGTTsCaPoMn2a h+297gGOT/ucB884xPdW3A/w7lQxUP8WPWPftzpAkS2x4d51VN6FLGUm5LeF0L0j78NvVvJ0jqKU 20Q4G9UVI+rJsMCYWaBY9Sax/Pt3SCpvE2iWxfwyfcRt+QMqpHpV2o9QeTRmC2Qg+anPVkxCEt3C QqDNY2SlUnSyojCnmnteiF3oFr9+3rc4hnfCeYs4FqJFHukcIFfVLvTnou5YRJA5Q3D6jTWAKQG0 uChmVNE7PhIQ9GPpGcHIknreQLHYQmsI1JuLkyxl+s9t81KNtzP5xgBhSGuPBQGenaTUSB4/IOs6 OFebJBWcGqKsJc1xjt6Txl9yx/3BhqO3m5yd2tj74O4hBSz/kkmPgL+fgIguPUFWgizpizbKhZuK bv5xfBjLWCq8Sd/q+woes8CqVRcniOIUuhcCyZmNkU19LmQcu3poK+Vz8icTps2AUrizM38wjYOZ vamhQhTKcIhJ+600SV0+QUe+tU9YjxtoAVyd0z6bhalFEM/pjPCQA+BAlnchMC7BqSdEFZV2dl0s /S2ci8JLiiOdckUewCJrmQRcogm9jJRciQ269eb6LbD1LCeEwD3bbj2TeRzBp6JHg5wA5tyJB7rN SiXS5VRFl+ve9UeFf4JZm3lDT/w4/xlD+XKw6UKaWZIFdUIce21lQldHLjrNjqR2xLJfNZLtGdAq 2QRit+RXm0fuXHzjsVnOaoztM6aHhG6TKmGPTidajNHpWXoLGCUcR2/A2c4uBuahaDDDId9M9KLt 1JmuiAgaqKFg5H2gAAkIljMgHrF+/+x9uO4r0K8AnCgxmlc6C1pyVgUVN12b1Ctfih74/Kdn2tk1 JIJOe3iTyxjbSfkzD7w=
X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@se1-lax1.servconfig.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/imapext/iyXr3vkSvq2i3ihRKK6ajhUutBc>
Subject: Re: [imapext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5524 (6214)
X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions <imapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/imapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:imapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 16:10:22 -0000

Good enough for me!Thanks. --Sent from a small device with autocorrect. Partial blame at https://standardstrack.com/ietf/lemonade/index.html
-------- Original message --------From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Date: 6/24/20  11:15 AM  (GMT-05:00) To: Дилян Палаузов <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org>, Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>, imapext <imapext@ietf.org> Cc: lemonade@ietf.org, Cridland Dave <dave@cridland.net>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Parsons Glenn <glenn.parsons@ericsson.com>, Leiba Barry <barryleiba@computer.org>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Subject: Re: [imapext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5524 (6214) On 24/06/2020 15:46, Дилян Палаузов wrote:> Hello,>> according to https://imapwiki.org/Specs RFC 5524 is supported by Cyrus IMAP and Dovecot only.>> https://github.com/dovecot/core/blob/master/src/imap/imap-client.c#L199> and https://github.com/cyrusimap/cyrus-imapd/blob/master/imap/imapd.c#L383 announce capability URLAUTH=BINARY.>> This was discussed at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/imapext/ .Isode didn't implement it.Eric, we did discuss it on IMAPEXT mailing list and I agreed with Дилян's text for the erratum.> Greetings>    Дилян>> On Wed, 2020-06-24 at 09:34 -0400, Eric Burger wrote:>> Bringing Alexey in, as I think we killed the LEMONADE list long ago…>>>> Alexey - did you build a URLAUTH=BINARY implementation? Do you know if anyone did?>>>>> On Jun 24, 2020, at 9:18 AM, Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 13:37, Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com> wrote:>>>> Resending with a better address for Dave, as he’s key to the question.>>>>>>>>> On Jun 24, 2020, at 8:32 AM, Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>> Hmmmm. It has been over a decade. What did people implement?>>>>>  From the RFC:>>>>> The capability is URLAUTH=BINARY.>>>>> The command is URLFETCH (… BINARY …)>>>>>>>> Yes, it's been a while.>>>>>> And I'm not actually sure if anyone ever did implement this. I'm certainly unsure how I'd find out now - Alexey>>> would know about Isode M-Box, and if that doesn't implement I'm not sure what else would. I've looked at both my>>> client (Polymer - been a while since I looked at that, too), and Panda IMAP, and neither support it.>>>>>> If Alexey doesn't support this, then my suspicion is that nobody does.>>>>>> On Jun 24, 2020, at 4:31 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:>>>>>>>>>>>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5524,>>>>>> "Extended URLFETCH for Binary and Converted Parts".>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------->>>>>> You may review the report below and at:>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6214>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------->>>>>> Type: Editorial>>>>>> Reported by: Дилян Палаузов <dpa-ietf@aegee.org>>>>>>>>>>>>> Section: 6>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Text>>>>>> ------------->>>>>> This document defines the URLFETCH=BINARY IMAP capability.  IANA has added it to the registry accordingly.>>>>>>>>>>>> Corrected Text>>>>>> -------------->>>>>> This document defines the URLAUTH=BINARY IMAP capability.  IANA is asked to replace URLFETCH=BINARY with>>>>>> URLAUTH=BINARY in the IMAP registry.>>>>>>>>>>>> Notes>>>>>> ----->>>>>> This document talks about URLAUTH=BINARY.  Mentioning URLFETCH=BINARY in the IANA section was not intended.>>>>>>>>>>>> Instructions:>>>>>> ------------->>>>>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please>>>>>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or>>>>>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party>>>>>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------->>>>>> RFC5524 (draft-cridland-urlfetch-binary-03)>>>>>> -------------------------------------->>>>>> Title               : Extended URLFETCH for Binary and Converted Parts>>>>>> Publication Date    : May 2009>>>>>> Author(s)           : D. Cridland>>>>>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD>>>>>> Source              : Enhancements to Internet email to support diverse service environments>>>>>> Area                : Applications>>>>>> Stream              : IETF>>>>>> Verifying Party     : IESG>> _______________________________________________> imapext mailing list> imapext@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext