Re: [imapext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-08: (with COMMENT)
S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 06 January 2016 23:40 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EFAF1A1BF5; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 15:40:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QcUqXBd6RA2n; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 15:40:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F571A1BE6; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 15:40:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.226.208.165]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u06NeVee007423 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 6 Jan 2016 15:40:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1452123645; x=1452210045; bh=p6O6CtyY74l6nCZ+e7GL+RicttMDF1Kiv6zXCwo2ceI=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=H98oVZPrE7KiKKoN+Ghm0l/B9e90Y0Et7EsRMy99OpfmlG3F0HUjf0iNenSEEXxN8 pA614m89c4J93n8mGjE2wCEO7lcqPWT08ubmvbivlqHXDtl9QTHuy40XqNBz+sXHUs fOVvUokbmKtb1+Fe0aDyyI7GE52WdpKZMRK0/hJ4=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1452123645; x=1452210045; i=@elandsys.com; bh=p6O6CtyY74l6nCZ+e7GL+RicttMDF1Kiv6zXCwo2ceI=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=HWEIuiAWW3f8MJj3LW+FUn37FXAFNrx/0MLUkHB0pNjyF6Zx1sDbW2GtRQVxHqtiD TcLY6UEDH6COivoFYXkRqx/lDHOpQE+84ZYYRTqYYEl6HOXFD/o5CLbA48RWOGlDHc 12300Mxyol9aE42/35QL0gvioc5M5WeNVeLPy6EY=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20160106152957.0d8df630@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 15:40:19 -0800
To: Narendra Singh Bisht <narendrasingh.bisht@gmail.com>, Jayantheesh S B <j.sb@sea.samsung.com>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160106231543.12304.75202.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20160106231543.12304.75202.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/imapext/js1NtipBfqzzxnWKwcy4L33poiI>
Cc: draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension@ietf.org, imapext@ietf.org, imapapnd-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [imapext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions <imapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/imapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:imapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 23:40:51 -0000
Hi Naren, Jay,
At 15:15 06-01-2016, Ben Campbell wrote:
>The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension/
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>COMMENT:
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>- section 2, last paragraph:
>
>It was not obvious to me if "An IMAP client SHOULD be able to parse both
>formats. " meant both STATUS and LIST, or both global and per-mailbox. I
>assume the former.
In the first paragraph of Section 2 there is the following:
"An IMAP server can publish the APPENDLIMIT capability in two
formats."
There are then two examples of the formats. In the last paragraph of
Section 2 there is:
"An IMAP client SHOULD be able to parse both formats."
Does that refer to the two examples in Section 2?
Regards,
S. Moonesamy (as document shepherd)
- [imapext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ie… Ben Campbell
- Re: [imapext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draf… S Moonesamy
- Re: [imapext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draf… Jayantheesh S B
- Re: [imapext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draf… S Moonesamy
- Re: [imapext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draf… Jayantheesh S B
- Re: [imapext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draf… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [imapext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draf… Jayantheesh S B
- Re: [imapext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draf… S Moonesamy
- Re: [imapext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draf… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [imapext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draf… Jayantheesh S B
- Re: [imapext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draf… S Moonesamy
- Re: [imapext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draf… S Moonesamy
- Re: [imapext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draf… Ben Campbell
- Re: [imapext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draf… S Moonesamy