RE: [imss] Last Call comments on draft-ietf-imss-fc-zs-mib-00.txt

Black_David@emc.com Thu, 14 September 2006 18:53 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GNwKj-0001gW-3u; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:53:09 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GNwKh-0001gR-WD for imss@ietf.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:53:08 -0400
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com ([128.222.32.20]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GNwKe-0000ik-8G for imss@ietf.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:53:07 -0400
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (nagas.lss.emc.com [10.254.144.11]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.1.8/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k8EIr14S002165; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:53:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from corpussmtp3.corp.emc.com (corpussmtp3.corp.emc.com [10.254.64.53]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.1.8/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k8EIqnWx018853; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:53:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: Black_David@emc.com
Received: from CORPUSMX20A.corp.emc.com ([128.221.62.13]) by corpussmtp3.corp.emc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:52:59 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [imss] Last Call comments on draft-ietf-imss-fc-zs-mib-00.txt
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:52:58 -0400
Message-ID: <F222151D3323874393F83102D614E05502B6737A@CORPUSMX20A.corp.emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <200609141602.JAA14545@cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [imss] Last Call comments on draft-ietf-imss-fc-zs-mib-00.txt
Thread-Index: AcbYF3x+jchz/ne0Ty2R67me7q34AwAF1HxQ
To: kzm@cisco.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Sep 2006 18:52:59.0041 (UTC) FILETIME=[FF53B910:01C6D82E]
X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075, Antispam-Engine: 2.4.0.264935, Antispam-Data: 2006.9.14.110943
X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=, SPAM=2%, Reason='EMC_FROM_0+ -2, NO_REAL_NAME 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __IMS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0'
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 25620135586de10c627e3628c432b04a
Cc: imss@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: imss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet and Management Support for Storage Working Group <imss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imss>, <mailto:imss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:imss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imss>, <mailto:imss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: imss-bounces@ietf.org

> OK, I assume you're not suggesting a re-ordering, but just the
insertion
> of sub-section titles, e.g., insert "3.3  Zoning Configuration and
> Management" immediately before::
> 
>    Zones are configured via a Fabric Zone Server, using ...

Yes.

Thanks,
--David

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith McCloghrie [mailto:kzm@cisco.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 12:03 PM
> To: Black, David
> Cc: imss@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [imss] Last Call comments on 
> draft-ietf-imss-fc-zs-mib-00.txt
> 
> > Section 3 is not a "Short" Overview of Fibre Channel ;-).  It could
> 
> OK, I'll just delete the "Short".
> 
> > usefully be broken into 3 subsections:
> > - Overview
> 
> After deleting "Short", this would be better as "Introduction" or as
> "General Overview".
> 
> > - Zoning
> > - Zoning Configuration and Management
> 
> OK, I assume you're not suggesting a re-ordering, but just the
insertion
> of sub-section titles, e.g., insert "3.3  Zoning Configuration and
> Management" immediately before::
> 
>    Zones are configured via a Fabric Zone Server, using ...
>  
> > The first paragraph describing zoning says:
> > 
> >    Zones within a fabric provide a mechanism to control frame
delivery
> >    between Nx_Ports ("Hard Zoning") or to expose selected views of
Name
> >    Server information ("Soft Zoning").  This technique is similar to
> >    virtual private networks in that the fabric has the ability to
group
> >    devices into Zones.
> > 
> > It needs an additional few sentences to explain what a zone does and
> > where it's enforced, specifically to make the following points:
> > - Communication is only possible when the communicating endpoints
> > 	are members of a common zone.
> > - Hard zoning and soft zoning are two different means of realizing
> > 	this.  Hard zoning is enforced in the fabric (i.e., switches)
> > 	whereas soft zoning is enforced at the endpoints (e.g., HBAs)
> > 	by relying on the endpoints to not send traffic to an N_Port_ID
> > 	not obtained from the nameserver with a few exceptions for well
> > 	known N_Port_IDs used to bootstrap the fabric (e.g., talk to the
> > 	nameserver).
>  
> OK.
> 
> > Section 5.4 ought to explain how an SNMP management client can
determine
> > whether a fabric is operating in basic vs. enhanced mode.
>  
> OK.  I'll add a paragraph which mentions t11ZsServerOperationMode, and
> probably t11ZsServerCapabilityObject as well.
> 
> Keith.
> 

_______________________________________________
imss mailing list
imss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imss