Re: [imss] [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

[<[e-mail]>]

And here's what I just did to that bullet ...

(5) RDDP Connection Setup: Good support for MPI applications requires a
small update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end of the
connection to initiate. In addition, a couple of minor changes to RDDP
connection setup (based on implementation experience) are needed to
generalize it for effective use with protocols that are not based on IP.

I'm about to send the result to Lars for wider review ...

Thanks,
--David


 


________________________________

	From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On
Behalf Of [e-mail]
	Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 2:46 PM
	To: [e-mail]
	Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
	Subject: Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version
	
	
	Arkady,
	 
	I'll beef up the bullet, but probably not with that
	degree of specifics.  Thanks for pointing this out,
	and I apologize for the delay in responding.

	Thanks,
	--David
	

	 


________________________________

		From: arkady kanevsky [mailto:[e-mail]]

		Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 5:26 PM
		To: Black, David
		Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
[e-mail]
		Subject: Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009
version
		
		
		David, 
		The description of RDDP MPA bullet is too narrow.
		(5) RDDP MPA: Good support for MPI applications requires
a small
		update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
		of the connection to initiate.

		This bullet should also cover ORD/IRD negotiation as
part of
		connection setup. Also current RDDP connection setup is
part of MPA
		spec which is primarily for TCP stream markers. This
bullet should provide
		RDDP connection setup for both TCP and SCTP and for any
message based
		protocol.

		How about:
		(5) RDDP Connection Setup: Good support for MPI
applications requires a small
		update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
		of the connection to initiate. Add RDMA Read credits to
RDDP Connection
		        Setup. Make RDDP connection setup to be
applicable for any message based
		        protocols, including but not limited to TCP with
MPA markers and SCTP.

		I hope it is not too late to beef up this bullet.
		Thanks,
		Arkady

		On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:03 PM, <[e-mail]>
wrote:
		

			What I believe is the final draft of the
proposed charter
			for the STORM WG is attached; I've done a bunch
of editing
			and added the info about T10 and T11 doc access.
This is
			about to go out for wider review.
			
			Also, a reminder that STORM discussion will stop
cc:'ing
			other mailing lists soon.  If you're interested
in STORM
			work, please subscribe to the [e-mail]
mailing list:
			https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm
			
			Finally - this is a near-final reminder that the
[e-mail]
			mailing list will be closing soon - all
discussion of RDDP
			protocols will move to the [e-mail]
mailing list.
			
			Thanks,
			--David
	
----------------------------------------------------
			David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
			EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA
01748
			[phone]             FAX: +1 (508)
293-7786
			[e-mail]        Mobile: +1 (978)
394-7754
	
----------------------------------------------------
			
			_______________________________________________
			rddp mailing list
			[e-mail]
			https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp
			
			




		-- 
		Cheers,
		Arkady Kanevsky