Re: [imss] MIB doctor review for T11-FC-SP-ZONING-MIB

Keith McCloghrie <kzm@cisco.com> Fri, 04 January 2008 16:19 UTC

Return-path: <imss-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JApH0-0002c4-Ka; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:19:54 -0500
Received: from imss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JApH0-0002bx-23 for imss-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:19:54 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JApGz-0002bj-M3 for imss@ietf.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:19:53 -0500
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JApGz-0002gD-8Z for imss@ietf.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:19:53 -0500
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.24,245,1196668800"; d="scan'208";a="2687525"
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Jan 2008 08:19:52 -0800
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com (sj-core-4.cisco.com [171.68.223.138]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m04GJq1w008435; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 08:19:52 -0800
Received: from cisco.com (pita.cisco.com [171.71.177.199]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id m04GJlq7006211; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 16:19:47 GMT
Received: (from kzm@localhost) by cisco.com (8.8.8-Cisco List Logging/8.8.8) id IAA12026; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 08:17:41 -0800 (PST)
From: Keith McCloghrie <kzm@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <200801041617.IAA12026@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [imss] MIB doctor review for T11-FC-SP-ZONING-MIB
To: bertietf@bwijnen.net (Bert Wijnen - IETF)
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 08:17:41 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <NIEJLKBACMDODCGLGOCNOEHDEEAA.bertietf@bwijnen.net> from "Bert Wijnen - IETF" at Dec 29, 2007 03:01:20 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=2023; t=1199463592; x=1200327592; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=kzm@cisco.com; z=From:=20Keith=20McCloghrie=20<kzm@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[imss]=20MIB=20doctor=20review=20for=20 T11-FC-SP-ZONING-MIB |Sender:=20; bh=i6d0TTGirCrUlalMur/DsXic91e/SgnZ04YAa4YfdrA=; b=rdmiT7cEtvw9fUyUK4IKfOJd8IHjtYRmnQkJM3dbsXDZJ5hRgeJHvERD2r QbrQhHEX6k9Ynm9YZUVclOwZ3TIl0tdGGiPqyWOAIiOxrZ+kJsdPoXDiBM12 1aOs3mkHDW;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=kzm@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e8a67952aa972b528dd04570d58ad8fe
Cc: imss@ietf.org, Keith McCloghrie <kzm@cisco.com>, Black_David <Black_David@emc.com>, Dan Romascanu <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-BeenThere: imss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet and Management Support for Storage Working Group <imss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imss>, <mailto:imss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:imss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imss>, <mailto:imss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: imss-bounces@ietf.org

Bert,

I believe that with my responses below, I have now responded to all of
the comments that you have sent for this I-D.  Further, especially
given the number and size of the MIB modules, we thank you for
expending the large amount of effort needed to provide all the
comments.

> This is a review of the module as extracted from the
> prelimenary draft-ietf-imss-fc-fcsp-mib-01.txt document
> 
> - I see:
> 
>    t11FcSpZoningMIB  MODULE-IDENTITY
>       LAST-UPDATED  "200702190000Z"
>       ORGANIZATION  "T11"
> 
>    I think that IETF IMSS WG should be included as one of
>    the ORGANIZATIONs that worked on this MIB module
 
Done.

> - I have seen
> 
>    t11FcSpZoneSetHashStatus OBJECT-TYPE
>        SYNTAX       INTEGER {
>                      calculate(1),
>                      correct(2),
>                      stale(3)
>                     }
> 
>    That SYNTAX a number of times in the set of MIB modules.
>    Candidate for a TC?

Done.

> - FOr that same object, I wonder how a re-calculate can be done
>   for a permanent row, since the storage type states:
> 
>            If an instance of this object has the value
>            'permanent(4)', the Zone Set database for the given
>            fabric on the given switch is not required to be
>            writeable."

Assuming that I've correctly understood your question, I'll add: 
a sentence in the DESCRIPTION of t11FcSpZoneSetHashStatus to say:

    If and when the corresponding instance of
    t11ZsServerDatabaseStorageType (defined in RFC 4936) has the value
    'permanent(4)', then if any the instance of an object in if any row
    of any table governed by t11ZsServerDatabaseStorageType has an
    object that is writable, then so too must be the corresponding
    instance of this object.

OK?

> - Same question about counter discontinuities as in my earlier 
>   MIB reviews yesterday.

I hope the same answer I gave to them will suffice here also.

Thanks,
Keith.


_______________________________________________
imss mailing list
imss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imss