Re: [imss] Re: Changes to draft-ietf-imss-fc-fam-mib-00.txt
Keith McCloghrie <kzm@cisco.com> Wed, 15 December 2004 22:20 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA23620 for <imss-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:20:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cehdi-0005Yn-O2 for imss-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:28:59 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CehKY-0003xE-7u; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:09:10 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CehJn-0003jK-2q for imss@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:08:23 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA22492 for <imss@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:08:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sj-iport-1-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70] helo=sj-iport-1.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CehS5-0005Dc-SX for imss@ietf.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:16:58 -0500
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (171.71.177.254) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Dec 2004 14:13:46 -0800
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Received: from cisco.com (cypher.cisco.com [171.69.11.142]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id iBFM7kMI001580; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:07:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from kzm@localhost) by cisco.com (8.8.8-Cisco List Logging/8.8.8) id OAA11079; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:07:48 -0800 (PST)
From: Keith McCloghrie <kzm@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <200412152207.OAA11079@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [imss] Re: Changes to draft-ietf-imss-fc-fam-mib-00.txt
To: kzm@cisco.com
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:07:48 -0800
In-Reply-To: <no.id> from "Keith McCloghrie" at Dec 15, 2004 11:48:02 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 848ed35f2a4fc0638fa89629cb640f48
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: imss@ietf.org, t11_5@mail.t11.org, Keith McCloghrie <kzm@cisco.com>
X-BeenThere: imss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet and Management Support for Storage Working Group <imss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imss>, <mailto:imss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:imss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imss>, <mailto:imss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: imss-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: imss-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0e9ebc0cbd700a87c0637ad0e2c91610
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bob Snively has reminded me of a related change which was discussed at the T11.5 Ad Hoc meeting last week. Specifically, we agreed in T11.5 that: 1. I will add a strong warning in draft-ietf-imss-fc-fam-mib-01.txt concerning the need for a Fabric name to be the same on all switches in a Fabric; this is just as true for a configured Fabric Name, as it is when the Fabric Name is the WWN of the Principal switch. 2. Bob will organize the submission of a contribution to the relevant part of T11 proposing that configured Fabric names be required to be from a subset of the namespace which has no overlap with the subset of the namespace occupied by all possible WWNs of Principal switches. Keith. --------------------- From: Keith McCloghrie <kzm@cisco.com> To: imss@ietf.org, t11_5@mail.t11.org Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:48:02 -0800 (PST) Subject: [imss] Re: Changes to draft-ietf-imss-fc-fam-mib-00.txt Hi, Since I sent the message below, the only comment that I've received was from Claudio, who pointed out to me that FC-SP contains more information on the subject; in particular, FC-SP defines what it calls an "Insistent Domain_ID" (see FC-SP, rev 1.6, page 122-123). Based on this, Claudio and I believe we need to change the syntax and DESCRIPTIONs of t11FamConfigDomainId & t11FamConfigDomainIdType, as follows: t11FamConfigDomainId OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX FcDomainIdOrZero MAX-ACCESS read-write STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The configured Domain_ID of the particular switch on this Fabric, or zero if no Domain_ID has been configured. The meaning of this object depends on the corresponding t11FamConfigDomainIdType object. If t11FamConfigDomainIdType is 'preferred', then the configured Domain_ID is called the 'preferred Domain_ID'. Valid values are between 0 and 239. In a situation where this Domain_ID can not be assigned, any other Domain_ID will be acceptable. A value of zero means any Domain_ID. If t11FamConfigDomainIdType is 'insistent', then the configured Domain_ID is called the 'insistent Domain_ID' and valid values are between 1 and 239. In a situation where this Domain_ID can not be assigned, no other Domain_ID is acceptable. In both of the above cases, the switch sends an RDI (Request Domain_ID) to request this Domain_ID to the Principal Switch. If no Domain_ID is able to be granted in the case of 'preferred', or if an 'insistent' Domain_ID is configured but not able to be granted, then it is an error condition. When this error occurs, the switch will continue as if it receives a SW_RJT with a reason/explanation of 'Unable to perform command request'/'Domain_ID not available'. That is, its E_Ports on that Fabric will be isolated and the administrator informed via a 't11FamDomainIdNotAssigned' notification. If t11FamConfigDomainIdType is 'static', then the configured Domain_ID is called the 'static Domain_ID' and valid values are between 1 and 239. In this situation, there is no Principal Switch in the Fabric and the Domain_ID is simply assigned by configuration, together with the Fabric_Name. A switch configured with a static Domain_ID, on receiving an EFP, BF, RCF, DIA or RDI SW_ILS shall reply with an SW_RJT having Reason Code Explanation 'E_Port is Isolated' and shall isolate the receiving E_Port." DEFVAL { 0 } ::= { t11FamEntry 2 } t11FamConfigDomainIdType OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER { preferred(1), insistent(2), static(3) } MAX-ACCESS read-write STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Type of configured Domain_ID contained in t11FamConfigDomainId." DEFVAL { preferred } ::= { t11FamEntry 3 } If I don't hear any further comments, I plan to create a draft-ietf-imss-fc-fam-mib-01.txt incorporating these changes. Thanks, Keith. ---------------- From: Keith McCloghrie <kzm> Message-Id: <200412051714.JAA09001@cisco.com> Subject: Changes to draft-ietf-imss-fc-fam-mib-00.txt To: imss@ietf.org, t11_5@mail.t11.org (T11.5) Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 09:14:15 -0800 (PST) Cc: kzm@cisco.com (Keith McCloghrie) Hi, One of the items raised in the IMSS WG at the last IETF meeting in Washington was that of updating draft-ietf-imss-fc-fam-mib-00.txt in accordance with the latest agreements in T11. An earlier revision of the I-D (draft-desanti-fc-domain-manager-00.txt, dated January 2004) contained two extra objects and an extra enumerated value for the T11FamState TC. At that earlier date, T11.5 decided that it was "premature" to define these, and they were deleted from subsequent revisions. The following text was recently added to FC-SW-4 (in section 7.1): Domain_IDs may be assigned statically or dynamically. When Domain_IDs are assigned statically, the administrator shall configure a Domain_ID and a Fabric_Name on each Switch of the Fabric, and the operations described in 7.3 and 7.4 shall not be performed by a Switch. When Domain_IDs are assigned dynamically, the operations described in 7.3 and 7.4 shall be performed by a Switch. Based on this addition to FC-SW-4, it is proposed that having the extra objects/enumeration is no longer "premature", and thus, that they should now be added. Here are the specific objects and enumeration: - additional enumeration to T11FamState: disabled(11), - two additional objects in the t11FamTable: t11FamEnable OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX TruthValue MAX-ACCESS read-write STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Enables the Fabric Address Manager on this switch on this Fabric. If enabled on a Fabric, the switch will participate in principal switch selection. If disabled, the switch will participate in neither the principal switch selection nor domain allocation. Thus, the corresponding value of t11FamConfigDomainIdType needs to be 'static'." DEFVAL { true } ::= { t11FamEntry 26 } t11FamFabricName OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX FcNameIdOrZero MAX-ACCESS read-write STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The WWN that is configured on this switch to be used as the name of this Fabric when the value of t11FamEnable is 'false'. If the value of t11FamEnable is 'true', this value is not used." ::= { t11FamEntry 27 } Are we agreed on this ? Keith. _______________________________________________ imss mailing list imss@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imss _______________________________________________ imss mailing list imss@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imss
- [imss] Changes to draft-ietf-imss-fc-fam-mib-00.t… Keith McCloghrie
- [imss] Re: Changes to draft-ietf-imss-fc-fam-mib-… Keith McCloghrie
- Re: [imss] Re: Changes to draft-ietf-imss-fc-fam-… Keith McCloghrie
- [imss] Re: Agenda for next week's T11.5 Managemen… Keith McCloghrie
- Re: [imss] FW: MIB Doctor review draft-ietf-imss-… Keith McCloghrie
- Re: [imss] FW: MIB Doctor review draft-ietf-imss-… Keith McCloghrie
- Re: [imss] FW: MIB Doctor review draft-ietf-imss-… Keith McCloghrie
- Re: [imss] Last Call: 'Fibre-Channel Name Server … Keith McCloghrie
- Re: [imss] Last Call: 'Fibre-Channel Name Server … Keith McCloghrie
- [imss] Re: DISCUSS on Keith McCloghrie
- [imss] Re: AD review of: draft-ietf-imss-fc-fspf-… Keith McCloghrie
- [imss] Re: AD review of: draft-ietf-imss-fc-fspf-… Keith McCloghrie
- [imss] Re: AD review of: draft-ietf-imss-fc-rtm-m… Keith McCloghrie
- [imss] Re: AD review of: draft-ietf-imss-fc-fspf-… Keith McCloghrie
- [imss] Re: AD review of: draft-ietf-imss-fc-fspf-… Claudio DeSanti
- Re: [imss] RE: AD review of: draft-ietf-imss-fc-r… Keith McCloghrie
- Re: [imss] RE: AD review of: draft-ietf-imss-fc-r… Keith McCloghrie
- Re: [imss] imss WG Last Call: Fibre Channel RSCN,… Keith McCloghrie
- Re: [imss] imss WG Last Call: Fibre Channel RSCN,… Keith McCloghrie
- Re: [imss] imss WG Last Call: Fibre Channel RSCN,… Keith McCloghrie
- Re: [imss] WG last call: draft-ietf-imss-fc-rscn-… Keith McCloghrie
- Re: [imss] imss WG Last Call: Fibre Channel RSCN,… Keith McCloghrie
- Re: [imss] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-imss-fc-fcs-m… Keith McCloghrie
- [imss] A couple of loose ends Keith McCloghrie
- Re: [imss] WG last call review: T11-FC-FABRIC-LOC… Keith McCloghrie
- Re: [imss] WG last call review: T11-FC-FABRIC-LOC… Keith McCloghrie
- Re: [imss] WG last call review: T11-FC-FABRIC-LOC… Claudio DeSanti
- Re: [imss] WG last call review: T11-FC-ZONE-SERVE… Keith McCloghrie
- Re: [imss] Last Call comments on draft-ietf-imss-… Keith McCloghrie
- RE: [imss] Last Call comments on draft-ietf-imss-… Black_David
- Re: [imss] Keith McCloghrie
- Re: [imss] Keith McCloghrie
- Re: [imss] T11 MIB issue resolutions Keith McCloghrie
- Re: [imss] T11 MIB issue resolutions Keith McCloghrie
- [imss] Rereview for draft-ietf-imss-fc-rscn-mib-0… Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- Re: [imss] Rereview of: draft-ietf-imss-fc-fcs-mi… Keith McCloghrie
- RE: [imss] Rereview of: draft-ietf-imss-fc-fcs-mi… Black_David
- Re: [imss] re-view: T11-FC-FABRIC-LOCK-MIB in Keith McCloghrie
- RE: [imss] re-view: T11-FC-FABRIC-LOCK-MIB in Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- Re: [imss] re-review: T11-FC-ZONE-SERVER-MIB in Keith McCloghrie
- RE: [imss] re-review: T11-FC-ZONE-SERVER-MIB in Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- Re: [imss] Acceptance of draft-kzm-imss-fc-fcsp-m… Keith McCloghrie
- RE: [imss] Acceptance of draft-kzm-imss-fc-fcsp-m… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [imss] imss WG Last Call: FC-SP MIB Keith McCloghrie
- RE: [imss] imss WG Last Call: FC-SP MIB Black_David
- Re: [imss] imss WG Last Call: FC-SP MIB Keith McCloghrie
- Re: [imss] imss WG Last Call: FC-SP MIB Keith McCloghrie
- RE: [imss] imss WG Last Call: FC-SP MIB WIJNEN, Bert (Bert)
- Re: [imss] imss WG Last Call: FC-SP MIB Keith McCloghrie
- RE: [imss] imss WG Last Call: FC-SP MIB Black_David
- Re: [imss] imss WG Last Call: FC-SP MIB Keith McCloghrie
- RE: [imss] imss WG Last Call: FC-SP MIB WIJNEN, Bert (Bert)
- RE: [imss] imss WG Last Call: FC-SP MIB WIJNEN, Bert (Bert)
- Re: [imss] imss WG Last Call: FC-SP MIB Keith McCloghrie
- Re: [imss] MIB doctor review part 1 (SYNTAX Check… Keith McCloghrie
- Re: [imss] MIB doctor review part 2 (T11-FC-SP-TC… Keith McCloghrie
- RE: [imss] MIB doctor review part 2 (T11-FC-SP-TC… WIJNEN, Bert (Bert)
- RE: [imss] imss WG Last Call: FC-SP MIB WIJNEN, Bert (Bert)
- Re: [imss] AD Review for draft-ietf-imss-fc-fcsp-… Keith McCloghrie
- Re: [imss] AD Review for draft-ietf-imss-fc-fcsp-… Black_David
- Re: [imss] AD Review for draft-ietf-imss-fc-fcsp-… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)