Re: [Inip-discuss] Innovation in DNS

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Mon, 22 August 2016 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: inip-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: inip-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E03812D6A6 for <inip-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 08:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hfut1RzNc5Ai for <inip-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 08:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (mx2.yitter.info [50.116.54.116]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67CF612D64F for <inip-discuss@iab.org>; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 08:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3700A10F8A for <inip-discuss@iab.org>; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:14:50 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx2.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MxqmZyiJE5Yw for <inip-discuss@iab.org>; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:14:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (192-0-220-231.cpe.teksavvy.com [192.0.220.231]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B42E10F84 for <inip-discuss@iab.org>; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:14:49 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:14:47 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: inip-discuss@iab.org
Message-ID: <20160822151447.GB1712@mx2.yitter.info>
References: <20160819171728.760E99FA@m0087794.ppops.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160819171728.760E99FA@m0087794.ppops.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/inip-discuss/2emJSolVja13r6xlePJqzrBKpvo>
Subject: Re: [Inip-discuss] Innovation in DNS
X-BeenThere: inip-discuss@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IAB Internet Names and Identifiers Discussion List <inip-discuss.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/inip-discuss>, <mailto:inip-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/inip-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:inip-discuss@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:inip-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/inip-discuss>, <mailto:inip-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:14:53 -0000

I don't have any objection to sending it to the list as an attachment.

A

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 05:17:28PM -0700, Scott Weeks wrote:
> 
> 
> For the Java-adverse folks out there like me the gentleman
> shared a PDF and said it's OK to share with the list members.
> I don't believe I should send it to the list as an attachment,
> so someone could tell me it's ok to send as an attachment, or
> folks could tell me individually they'd like a copy.
> 
> scott
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Inip-discuss mailing list
> > > Inip-discuss@iab.org
> > > https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/inip-discuss
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Inip-discuss mailing list
> Inip-discuss@iab.org
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/inip-discuss

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com