Re: [Inip-discuss] aliases and classes (was Re: Domain Names)

Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> Sun, 21 February 2016 09:58 UTC

Return-Path: <avri@acm.org>
X-Original-To: inip-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: inip-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8021A1A68 for <inip-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 01:58:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.235
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.77, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ajNWpuPRrRkL for <inip-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 01:58:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from atl4mhob20.myregisteredsite.com (atl4mhob20.registeredsite.com [209.17.115.114]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4911A03F9 for <inip-discuss@iab.org>; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 01:58:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com ([10.30.71.206]) by atl4mhob20.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u1L9wCh9024122 for <inip-discuss@iab.org>; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 04:58:12 -0500
Received: (qmail 5866 invoked by uid 0); 21 Feb 2016 09:58:12 -0000
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 208.54.86.235
X-Authenticated-UID: avri@ella.com
Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (avri@ella.com@208.54.86.235) by 0 with ESMTPA; 21 Feb 2016 09:58:11 -0000
References: <2n8dkck7bl3hvk3pq4tya7bc.1453512710966@email.android.com> <20160123145602.GE14205@mx2.yitter.info> <20160209185917.GE53835@mx2.yitter.info> <56BCEF72.2080101@acm.org> <D2E3C043.13856%edward.lewis@icann.org> <20160214180932.GR66257@mx2.yitter.info> <20160215011252.GT66257@mx2.yitter.info> <D2EA0130.13972%edward.lewis@icann.org>
To: inip-discuss@iab.org
From: Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Organization: Technicalities
Message-ID: <56C98A2E.9080206@acm.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 11:58:06 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D2EA0130.13972%edward.lewis@icann.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 160220-2, 02/20/2016), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/inip-discuss/T7VNUoiadBKmUOvBZHVnIXrgG9I>
Subject: Re: [Inip-discuss] aliases and classes (was Re: Domain Names)
X-BeenThere: inip-discuss@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: avri@acm.org
List-Id: IAB Internet Names and Identifiers Discussion List <inip-discuss.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/inip-discuss>, <mailto:inip-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/inip-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:inip-discuss@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:inip-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/inip-discuss>, <mailto:inip-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 09:58:16 -0000

Hi,


On 16-Feb-16 23:56, Edward Lewis wrote:
> I'll underline and underscore (I'd do it in ASCII-art but...well..) that
> I'm not sure how to work that in. Besides wanting to tell the future DNS
> engineers to pave over it when they can, I'd like CLASS to not be a red
> herring in any attempt to clarify (if you will) the Domain Name namespace.
>
> I could be wrong - this is just my personal opinion, at this time, so take
> the comment as just an opinion.

I think something has to be done, because on first level of inspection,
it looks like a reasonable solution to problems of the policy variety -
such as overlapping use of names or establishing different schemes with
other authorities.  It is only once a person dives in that they discover
it is broken.

Personally I would have preferred a miracle fix to this but I understand
that isn't going to happen and probably isn't even possible given global
deployment.  Something I think a pity, but I think you have to put a
stake into it or it will remain a temptation.

I guess I think it is more than a red herring.

avri


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus