IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Inip-discuss] Domain Names

avri <avri@ella.com> Sat, 23 January 2016 01:32 UTC

Return-Path: <avri@ella.com>
X-Original-To: inip-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: inip-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50D71B2EA9 for <inip-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:32:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PBtm71TvOH3n for <inip-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:32:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from atl4mhob12.myregisteredsite.com (atl4mhob12.myregisteredsite.com [209.17.115.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008C11B2EA8 for <inip-discuss@iab.org>; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:32:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com ([10.30.71.211]) by atl4mhob12.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u0N1WL5w026364 for <inip-discuss@iab.org>; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 20:32:21 -0500
Received: (qmail 29702 invoked by uid 0); 23 Jan 2016 01:32:21 -0000
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 68.15.42.104
X-Authenticated-UID: avri@ella.com
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.102?) (avri@ella.com@68.15.42.104) by 0 with ESMTPA; 23 Jan 2016 01:32:21 -0000
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 20:32:18 -0500
Message-ID: <2n8dkck7bl3hvk3pq4tya7bc.1453512710966@email.android.com>
Importance: normal
From: avri <avri@ella.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>, inip-discuss@iab.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--_com.android.email_8059095356526790"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/inip-discuss/csz8Gs0pRB4QnPVgW_NCsZAwDfo>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:35:19 -0800
Subject: Re: [Inip-discuss] Domain Names
X-BeenThere: inip-discuss@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IAB Internet Names and Identifiers Discussion List <inip-discuss.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/inip-discuss>, <mailto:inip-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/inip-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:inip-discuss@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:inip-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/inip-discuss>, <mailto:inip-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 01:32:24 -0000

Only cname ignores it?


Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device

<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> </div><div>Date:01/22/2016  5:51 PM  (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: inip-discuss@iab.org </div><div>Cc:  </div><div>Subject: Re: [Inip-discuss] Domain Names </div><div>
</div>On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 03:02:50PM -0500, Avri Doria wrote:
> I had always understood that CLASS was broken in some sense in that the
> standard RR types ignored it.

The standard RR types don't ignore it.  A is defined only for IN, for instance.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

_______________________________________________
Inip-discuss mailing list
Inip-discuss@iab.org
https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/inip-discuss

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email