Re: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-18: comments and questions

"Paul Giralt (pgiralt)" <pgiralt@cisco.com> Thu, 07 April 2016 02:27 UTC

Return-Path: <pgiralt@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583E412D138 for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 19:27:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.531
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WUDqRDQu-mxI for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 19:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDDEB12D0A3 for <insipid@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 19:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1314; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1459996072; x=1461205672; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=5mNH1YnfCaSltsv5UOaYl/J/oggI31FwF3tLKsA1dpc=; b=dqvVyfbVQ0r1xO5cMzD1mOwVhVINFgBZW5V1kNKfnd4wAOLZNuG4fCK0 c+Tq1UkoNHLIgDA8lL8vzW6R0/3aDemm5yRTHZq5QukJ3Zyj/1T1m5a5W W3Y1ylqKEjeh/XhFQr8KGWTnlaZyIzemqHCc2ox18qH1vbE295rI9s361 M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0D1AQBuxQVX/4MNJK1cgzeBVrpHAQ2Bc?= =?us-ascii?q?4YNAhyBKTgUAQEBAQEBAWUnhEIBAQMBIxFFEAIBCBoCJgICAjAVEAEBBA6IJAi?= =?us-ascii?q?vVZFkAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFXyFJYF1CIJOhz8rgisBBJgEAY4Kj?= =?us-ascii?q?w6PIgEeAQFCg2eIYX4BAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,448,1454976000"; d="scan'208";a="256572426"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 07 Apr 2016 02:27:51 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-018.cisco.com (xch-rtp-018.cisco.com [64.101.220.158]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u372RpCO013117 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 7 Apr 2016 02:27:51 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-018.cisco.com (64.101.220.158) by XCH-RTP-018.cisco.com (64.101.220.158) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 22:27:50 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-018.cisco.com ([64.101.220.158]) by XCH-RTP-018.cisco.com ([64.101.220.158]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 22:27:50 -0400
From: "Paul Giralt (pgiralt)" <pgiralt@cisco.com>
To: Brett Tate <brett@broadsoft.com>
Thread-Topic: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-18: comments and questions
Thread-Index: AdGKjoY1cNJ5jXYgSYmyGC49bFEmrAFQBpWAABFBvwAAILv4gA==
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 02:27:50 +0000
Message-ID: <D66E5B25-E342-4333-BF71-2404247CFD5A@cisco.com>
References: <7fe4e490ec6b9eb7b87b288748456e09@mail.gmail.com> <62C9B6F3-488B-4B8F-9657-EA2EA1ADB8DF@cisco.com> <2b172d66af0e89739e1b8ed8285b130f@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2b172d66af0e89739e1b8ed8285b130f@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.123.203]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <413F9A46BD808A49BE295204799D872B@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/insipid/5l10-9fWdxONm8sozDBJtbd4aaE>
Cc: "insipid@ietf.org" <insipid@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-18: comments and questions
X-BeenThere: insipid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <insipid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/insipid/>
List-Post: <mailto:insipid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 02:27:54 -0000

> 
> If bullet 1 applies, draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-19 bullet 5 needs a
> modification similar to bullet 3's "note" to make it obvious.  Without such
> a note, it looks like the last sentence of bullet 5 applies when building
> CANCEL response.  The is especially true since bullet 1 has an exception
> indicating that it doesn't apply to CANCEL.

I’ve added similar verbiage to bullet 5 to make it clear but after reading bullet 1 again, I will be removing the statement "(with the exception of ACK or CANCEL as described below)” because there is no response to an ACK anyway, so it doesn’t really make sense and we want bullet 1 to apply to CANCEL as well. I’m not sure I remember why I added that in the first place, but it seems wrong. Let me know if you see any issue with this. 

Were you planning on any additional feedback on draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-19? If not, I’ll upload -20 with these final modifications. 

-Paul