Re: [Insipid] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-12: (with COMMENT)

"Arun Arunachalam (carunach)" <> Fri, 14 September 2018 19:47 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3DB6130EA7; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 12:47:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a2M6NB78RkvV; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 12:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD4EC130F0E; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 12:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=16971; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1536954422; x=1538164022; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=aeSloGWa2v7rNjEYMwvho2xnoc9xUfgK5Kaob0iswdE=; b=eJw4+bE6IP1p6+QnNW5k3PUkC+05GGJosOyYR4nmfly+vbGdAgqUSule 90OsEuasx/ii/jjwr0oiVvBkZOAs8uR52joKV5DLO6nRpEdmx3eI2kahW 4jQsRxNsYoX1Ls4hC+LS7dfHJZLiClVtxshtXDixwfHJ4VYbmTb6V0o2B k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0C6AACnD5xb/5BdJa1bGgEBAQEBAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEIAQEBAYFSgQ93gWQoCpglgWiWZoF6C4RsAoNeITYWAQMBAQIBAQJtKIU?= =?us-ascii?q?5BnkQAgEIPwcyFBECBA4FgyGBHmSmdYoJimgXggCBOQwTgkyBQYZvgiYCjUG?= =?us-ascii?q?FZ4kMCQKQEhePBZQdAhEUgSUkDCWBVXAVZQGCQYIxHI4Gb413gR4BAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.53,374,1531785600"; d="scan'208,217";a="452293778"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Sep 2018 19:47:01 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w8EJl1DR005393 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 14 Sep 2018 19:47:01 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 14:47:01 -0500
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 14:47:01 -0500
From: "Arun Arunachalam (carunach)" <>
To: Adam Roach <>
CC: "Dawes, Peter, Vodafone Group" <>, The IESG <>, "" <>, "" <>, "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <>, "" <>, "Arun Arunachalam (carunach)" <>
Thread-Topic: [Insipid] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-12: (with COMMENT)
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 19:47:00 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1EEADD8D5731477EB39FE7D0F325F757ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Insipid] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-12: (with COMMENT)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 19:47:19 -0000

Thanks Adam!

We will incorporate the additional suggestions and publish a new draft version.

Peter and Arun

On Sep 14, 2018, at 3:42 PM, Adam Roach <<>> wrote:

Hi! Thanks, these all look like good resolutions to the issues I raised. I have a small handful of editorial nits (below). They're extremely minor, and all have to do with hyphenation of compound adjectives.


On 9/6/18 5:42 AM, Dawes, Peter, Vodafone Group wrote:

   o  If a dialog is to be marked, the only way to initiate "log me"
      marking is at the dialog creating request (e.g.  SIP INVITE) sent

"...dialog-creating request..."

   o  If a "log me" aware endpoint or intermediary that is already "log

'If a "log me"-aware endpoint...'

   o  If a "log me" aware endpoint or intermediary that is not "log me"

'If a "log me"-aware endpoint...'

   o  By requesting header and session level privacy from SIP
      intermediaries using the Privacy header

"...header- and session-level privacy..."