[Insipid] INSIPID will not have a meeting at IETF91

"Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com> Tue, 21 October 2014 14:48 UTC

Return-Path: <gsalguei@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A50F1A86E7 for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 07:48:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XsiW9XQ0Qpwi for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 07:48:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EEC91A6F6D for <insipid@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 07:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1420; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1413902912; x=1415112512; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Cd/KsLjt95GdmaLHhx51cH9G7W+5G2hZ3alnx8GQuj0=; b=C+RGoRUyHTfIqlmABs1gn0KYKxpKUnm75FNU38eGvXq3LpewKh4f2RBh 0iY+aJSvSwHhDxDcinBvKoaZ03RVVcr2FrPmCx9dVrF5Kf/DNEo1LnOmh pxxMii88YIUclBuXIFgXPnIJAwlisaiD0fXDne5vWD/Ho5c+RSlv3WWFS A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,762,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="88997465"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Oct 2014 14:48:32 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com []) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9LEmVOp009160 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:48:31 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([]) by xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:48:31 -0500
From: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
To: "insipid@ietf.org" <insipid@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: INSIPID will not have a meeting at IETF91
Thread-Index: AQHP7T4UpIWM5d4IQ0C/N9NXg7Ofkg==
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:48:31 +0000
Message-ID: <BA141347-E1EE-442C-9D8C-B5C8EA0AD8CC@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <4FFF3B55A4867A479B7AA44F66200295@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/insipid/F9VCFo5bV7O1MpDlt-5LqcqEhvI
Cc: "insipid-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <insipid-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [Insipid] INSIPID will not have a meeting at IETF91
X-BeenThere: insipid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <insipid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/insipid/>
List-Post: <mailto:insipid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:48:51 -0000

Folks -

The INSIPID WG will not be meeting in Hawaii.  After discussion with the
authors there do not appear to be any open issues requiring F2F

We are making good progress on the remaining documents. Below is a 
status update on the remaining milestones:

- The Session-ID solutions document
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-insipid-session-id/) is in
WGLC after extensive WG review. The WGLC ends November 1st.  There was
a comment on the list that perhaps the proximity to the meeting might
impact folks' ability to devote review cycles to the document, so we can
certainly extend the WGLC period if that is deemed necessary. Please let
us know.

- The 'logme' requirement draft
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs/) has
addressed all pending review feedback.  After the Hawaii meeting the
document shepherd will provide a final review in preparation for

- The 'logme' solutions draft
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs/) is in
need of further review. The chairs ask the WG to please set aside some
time to provide review feedback on the document.  Additionally, to
accelerate this endeavor Peter Dawes will be explicitly requesting
specific individual to review the document to the list.

Please let the chairs know if you have issues with any of the above.


Gonzalo & Keith