Re: [Insipid] Review of draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-02 [[WAS: Re: draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-02.txt: comments]]
"Dawes, Peter, Vodafone Group" <Peter.Dawes@vodafone.com> Mon, 11 May 2015 11:46 UTC
Return-Path: <Peter.Dawes@vodafone.com>
X-Original-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399A31A1B53 for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2015 04:46:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, GB_I_LETTER=-2, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5i9ZGUsRiBuo for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2015 04:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.bemta3.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta3.messagelabs.com [195.245.230.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7F551A1A8F for <insipid@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 May 2015 04:46:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [85.158.138.179] by server-12.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id A7/57-02928-38690555; Mon, 11 May 2015 11:46:11 +0000
X-Env-Sender: Peter.Dawes@vodafone.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-169.messagelabs.com!1431344743!9463640!1
X-Originating-IP: [195.232.244.134]
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 6.13.14; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 2490 invoked from network); 11 May 2015 11:45:43 -0000
Received: from mailout02.vodafone.com (HELO mailout02.vodafone.com) (195.232.244.134) by server-4.tower-169.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 May 2015 11:45:43 -0000
Received: from mailint01.vodafone.com (mailint01.vodafone.com [195.232.244.198]) by mailout02.vodafone.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3llgSR131pzbdNs; Mon, 11 May 2015 13:45:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mailint01.vodafone.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailint01.vodafone.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3llgSQ6zPszxQ2h; Mon, 11 May 2015 13:45:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from VOEXC06W.internal.vodafone.com (voexc06w.dc-ratingen.de [145.230.101.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailint01.vodafone.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3llgSQ6t2QzxPBl; Mon, 11 May 2015 13:45:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from VOEXC30W.internal.vodafone.com (145.230.103.202) by VOEXC06W.internal.vodafone.com (145.230.101.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Mon, 11 May 2015 13:45:42 +0200
Received: from VOEXM31W.internal.vodafone.com ([169.254.7.244]) by voexc30w ([145.230.103.202]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Mon, 11 May 2015 13:45:42 +0200
From: "Dawes, Peter, Vodafone Group" <Peter.Dawes@vodafone.com>
To: Jörgen Axell <jorgen.axell@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: Review of draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-02 [[WAS: Re: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-02.txt: comments]]
Thread-Index: AQHQi6renfJRAtOy+EuB3XNEpqG6gJ12mNKw
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 11:45:41 +0000
Message-ID: <4A4F136CBD0E0D44AE1EDE36C4CD9D99AEEBFBB7@VOEXM31W.internal.vodafone.com>
References: <5AEA7B339C0B944BB33A6939249264AD1A27578D@ESESSMB305.ericsson.se> <2237B877-86D9-4C15-B5A6-24B8295DD98E@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <2237B877-86D9-4C15-B5A6-24B8295DD98E@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/insipid/GgaJqb0BHQn_h-V67Umg4f1kzOE>
Cc: "insipid@ietf.org" <insipid@ietf.org>, "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Insipid] Review of draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-02 [[WAS: Re: draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-02.txt: comments]]
X-BeenThere: insipid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <insipid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/insipid/>
List-Post: <mailto:insipid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 11:46:17 -0000
Hello Jörgen, thanks very much for your review and for identifying these issues in the current text of the requirements draft. I suggest some resolutions below. Regarding Section 3, I agree that not using the letters A, B, C for both would more clearly distinguish between countries and networks, I will change this in the next version. Regarding REQ6:, you make a good point that "It is harder to understand what the SIP proxy needs to remember if it decides to mark a request that the UA did not mark ". The solutions draft proposes that marking is always on a per-dialog granularity, i.e. marking always starts with the dialog-creating SIP request, which makes the proxy behaviour easier to understand. A proxy may mark the dialog-creating request (if the UA didn't do it) and any subsequent in-dialog requests sent in the originating to terminating direction. It might be worth including a REQ9: as follows to put clearer boundaries on the behaviour. REQ9: "log me" marking of requests and responses MUST be applied on a per-dialog granularity. If applied, "log me" marking MUST begin with the dialog-creating request and SHOULD continue to the dialog end. "log me" marking MUST NOT be stopped and re-started on a given dialog. perhaps this would be better placed between REQ7: and REQ8: Regarding Section 6.2.1, I will replace each occurrence of "it" in the next version (new text between asterisks) as follows. The "log me" marker is not sensitive information, although (it) *the "log me" marker* will sometimes be inserted because a particular device is experiencing problems. Activating a debug mode affects the operation of a terminal, therefore (it) *debugging configuration* must be supplied by an authorized server to an authorized terminal, (it) *debugging configuration* must not be altered in transit, and (it) must not be readable by an unauthorized third party. Logged signalling is privacy-sensitive data, therefore (it) *signalling logs* must be passed to an authorized server, (it) *signalling logs* must not be altered in transit, and (it) must not be readable by an unauthorized third party. Best regards, Peter -----Original Message----- From: Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei) [mailto:gsalguei@cisco.com] Sent: 11 May 2015 06:25 To: Jörgen Axell Cc: insipid@ietf.org; Dawes, Peter, Vodafone Group Subject: Review of draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-02 [[WAS: Re: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-02.txt: comments]] Thanks for your review, Jorgen. I will let Peter, as editor of the document, respond to your review but I am updating the subject since it is misleading as it is a review is for the requirements document and not the ‘logme’ solution document. Cheers, Gonzalo <as chair> > On May 8, 2015, at 8:31 AM, Jörgen Axell <jorgen.axell@ericsson.com> wrote: > > In general, I believe this functionality is useful to be able to trace faults in a network. Having a signalling based activation is a simple way to follow the path in a network. I have a few comments: > > Section 3: I assume the Network A, B, C has no connection to Country A, B, C. Maybe numbers or different letters is clearer. > > REQ-6: I understand that if the SIP proxy marks a response for logging because the UAS did not echo the log-me marker, then it needs to remember that the marker was present in the request. It is harder to understand what the SIP proxy needs to remember if it decides to mark a request that the UA did not mark. Is this rather configuration than remembering something? > > 6.2.1 The text following "Activating a debug mode" contains a number of "it" which I find hard to read. I assume "it" refers to the activation request but I don't think that is clear from the text. > > On the nit side, REQ-1 contains a "log me", which I believe should be "log-me". > > Regards, > Jörgen > > -----Original Message----- > From: insipid [mailto:insipid-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > internet-drafts@ietf.org > Sent: 27 February 2015 14:21 > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > Cc: insipid@ietf.org > Subject: [Insipid] I-D Action: draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-02.txt > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the INtermediary-safe SIP session ID Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : Marking SIP Messages to be Logged > Author : Peter Dawes > Filename : draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-02.txt > Pages : 14 > Date : 2015-02-27 > > Abstract: > SIP networks use signalling monitoring tools to diagnose user > reported problems and for regression testing if network or user agent > software is upgraded. As networks grow and become interconnected, > including connection via transit networks, it becomes impractical to > predict the path that SIP signalling will take between user agents, > and therefore impractical to monitor SIP signalling end-to-end. > > This document describes an indicator for the SIP protocol which can > be used to mark signalling as of interest to logging. Such marking > will typically be applied as part of network testing controlled by > the network operator and not used in regular user agent signalling. > However, such marking can be carried end-to-end including the SIP > user agents, even if a session originates and terminates in different > networks. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking/ > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-02 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-02 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > insipid mailing list > insipid@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid > > _______________________________________________ > insipid mailing list > insipid@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid
- [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-02.txt… Jörgen Axell
- [Insipid] Review of draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs… Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)
- [Insipid] Review of draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs… Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)
- Re: [Insipid] Review of draft-ietf-insipid-logme-… Dawes, Peter, Vodafone Group