Re: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-07: comments

"Arun Arunachalam (carunach)" <carunach@cisco.com> Thu, 25 August 2016 23:21 UTC

Return-Path: <carunach@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E924E12D14D for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:21:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.07
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.07 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V7GO7-CPgTik for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:21:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAF3A12B056 for <insipid@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:21:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1193; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1472167299; x=1473376899; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=CXAp5mpINh+rXo+AHYTd3Gyoa09kxmD6HgkTUGHf5w0=; b=SzACG5GTzaeljJKKFcmtPW1XX2USY0fMrrLnYcoJqRCkKZJWr7vnuwxl ATmwjNsIor4Ash2KpWaTZ75zkF53HXYNJ0EJ8n2MXxkRGh9x8cKcCeG6M 3qsXlnuQE+biuCkZekbJqRv2z7gfrATfAn9Wep9go6H6V0tQ66UbO4m8B k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0B1AQCIfL9X/4QNJK1dGQEBAQEBgyMBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAR5WfAeNKapxgX8ZC4UvSgKBYjgUAQEBAQEBAQEBAV4nhGEBAQEDAQEBATc?= =?us-ascii?q?0CwULAgEIGB4QJwslAQEEDgWIKggOwA4BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXB?= =?us-ascii?q?YgmglWEMw2DLYIvBY4hhWKFRwGPJo9RjEGDeAEeNoQNcIQggS1/AQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,578,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="145438604"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 25 Aug 2016 23:21:38 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-015.cisco.com (xch-rcd-015.cisco.com [173.37.102.25]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7PNLceq020879 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 25 Aug 2016 23:21:38 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-015.cisco.com (173.36.7.25) by XCH-RCD-015.cisco.com (173.37.102.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:21:37 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-015.cisco.com ([173.36.7.25]) by XCH-ALN-015.cisco.com ([173.36.7.25]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:21:37 -0500
From: "Arun Arunachalam (carunach)" <carunach@cisco.com>
To: Brett Tate <brett@broadsoft.com>
Thread-Topic: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-07: comments
Thread-Index: AdH+0g3Qg0gFEARlQCS+NNcQWc0bWAAf0gmA
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 23:21:37 +0000
Message-ID: <AB71014A-7E75-46FA-84C1-84803529FC3F@cisco.com>
References: <ae0ea4537218957675fac8f5cf11541d@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <ae0ea4537218957675fac8f5cf11541d@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.150.54.97]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <BCA6304C7AAFCB4F9760D733E55AA1BA@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/insipid/HiC0R-5pdIxV4bEReE3GS0i4UyM>
Cc: "Arun Arunachalam \(carunach\)" <carunach@cisco.com>, "insipid@ietf.org" <insipid@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-07: comments
X-BeenThere: insipid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <insipid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/insipid/>
List-Post: <mailto:insipid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 23:21:41 -0000

Thanks Brett !

We will incorporate your feedback in the next version.

Arun


> On Aug 25, 2016, at 9:10 AM, Brett Tate <brett@broadsoft.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The following are some comments concerning
> draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-07.
> 
> Thanks,
> Brett
> 
> ------
> 
> 1) Section 4 paragraph 1 indicates "Header fields MUST be logged in their
> long form and not the compact form described in RFC 3261 [RFC3261] clause
> 7.3.3".  The mandate should potentially be downgraded to a SHOULD since
> unable to comply when it is an unknown header.  For instance as new
> headers as defined with a compact form, deployed devices become
> non-compliant until upgraded or configured to know the compact/long form
> of the header name.  If it matters (and the mandate makes it harder to
> find the bug), the use of the compact form might be exposing a bug on the
> particular device.
> 
> 2) References to draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-12 should be updated to the
> latest version of the draft.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> insipid mailing list
> insipid@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid