[Insipid] Suresh Krishnan's Abstain on draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-12: (with COMMENT)

"Suresh Krishnan" <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> Wed, 01 February 2017 20:15 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148598013597.19147.1512173812823544536.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 12:15:35 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/insipid/JrQS8kWwTOysYXSVuPmuYntu8rI>
Cc: insipid@ietf.org, insipid-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs@ietf.org, gsalguei@cisco.com
Subject: [Insipid] Suresh Krishnan's Abstain on draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-12: (with COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-12: Abstain

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I do see the value in the content of this document, but I do not see the
value of publishing it as a separate RFC at this point of time. I think
it should be merged into the solution document.

[Insipid] Suresh Krishnan's Abstain on draft-ietf… Suresh Krishnan