[Insipid] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-12: (with COMMENT)

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Tue, 14 August 2018 17:56 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: insipid@ietf.org
Delivered-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7221130DE1; Tue, 14 Aug 2018 10:56:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking@ietf.org, insipid-chairs@ietf.org, gsalguei@cisco.com, insipid@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.83.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <153426939480.27116.8218591880709971920.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 10:56:34 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/insipid/O1unRp29YwiIrpu89Jr3ps6fti8>
Subject: [Insipid] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: insipid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <insipid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/insipid/>
List-Post: <mailto:insipid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 17:56:35 -0000

Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-12: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank  you for a clear and well written document.

A rich version of this review is at:

Thank you for a clear and well-written document.

An HTML version of this review is at:
https://mozphab-ietf.devsvcdev.mozaws.net/D11687

Line: 124
I'm uncomfortable with the "operators need to" wording -- perhaps "operators
often have to", or "operators are often expected to"?

Line: 1555
The privacy implications of all of this seem large -- I think that it would be
really useful to make "Privacy" be its own section, and not a subsection of
Security Considerations.