IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Insipid] Review of draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-02

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Wed, 10 June 2015 13:05 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053C21A1BD9 for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 06:05:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kwez55Q747Ns for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 06:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg22.ericsson.net (sesbmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E16AD1A1BEE for <insipid@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 06:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-f799f6d000000faf-44-557835fb351b
Received: from ESESSHC017.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by sesbmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 10.AF.04015.BF538755; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:04:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.72]) by ESESSHC017.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.69]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:04:59 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "insipid@ietf.org" <insipid@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Insipid] Review of draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-02
Thread-Index: AQHQoc9he4+R7vgLMUuxbp7avLo3752ltpKA
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 13:04:58 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D8B6E33@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <55756367.7090109@gmx.com>
In-Reply-To: <55756367.7090109@gmx.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.146]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrDLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvre5v04pQg3uLLS3m33/GZNH38guT A5PHkiU/mTz6ZqxnDGCK4rJJSc3JLEst0rdL4Mo4NfcoY8ETroq9X8+wNzDe4ehi5OSQEDCR 2Ht4HxuELSZx4d56IJuLQ0jgKKPEu1X/wBJCAosZJb6/Euhi5OBgE7CQ6P6nDRIWEdCU+Hjj HDOIzSxgKXF360kWEFtYwFFidd8xFogaJ4kprXeZIGwjiRnnJoHFWQRUJXZ++ANm8wr4SjQ3 P2KHWKUm8eD4DLC1nALqEkcapzGC2IxAt30/tYYJYpe4xK0n85kgbhaQWLLnPDOELSrx8vE/ VghbSeLHhkssEPV6EjemTmGDsLUlli18zQyxV1Di5MwnLBMYxWYhGTsLScssJC2zkLQsYGRZ xShanFqclJtuZKSXWpSZXFycn6eXl1qyiREYPQe3/DbYwfjyueMhRgEORiUeXsVZ5aFCrIll xZW5hxilOViUxHlnbM4LFRJITyxJzU5NLUgtii8qzUktPsTIxMEp1cBYw2jKIeui2r3+1OzK O4dtlhYL9esaLpSz6YmbwH/glvCZ5KTlZfGSBSaLk3Xerb38bx+Xa1/3gZ4Js4tfVp3Q654h nG75yd9JTaG06uu1Xf2r6x4avd576V/MhFc5t1p82yRrtrkY50fPdhEzkFo478/3yq7yQJGp Gjfm/19Qqa+qeVHAdpoSS3FGoqEWc1FxIgACifB9fwIAAA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/insipid/OLJwvVAt5ZmWhgucjf5usgJF_8c>
Cc: "Peter.Dawes@vodafone.com" <Peter.Dawes@vodafone.com>
Subject: Re: [Insipid] Review of draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-02
X-BeenThere: insipid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <insipid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/insipid/>
List-Post: <mailto:insipid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 13:05:13 -0000

Hi,

I have read the draft. In general it looks ok, but I have a few questions on the requirements.


Q1 (editorial):

In REQ3, I suggest to place the "A "log me" marker SHOULD be removed at trust domain boundaries." sentence before the rest of the text.


Q2 (editorial/technical):

I don't understand REQ4, saying "SIP entities SHOULD log SIP requests or responses with a "log me" marker."

Also, in e.g. REQ6 it is then said that proxies MAY insert the marker, which seems to contradict.


Q3 (editorial/technical):

Regarding REQ5, does that also apply to UAs that do NOT support the mechanism? If so, I think that should be explicitly stated, because it will have big impact on the technical solution.


Regards,

Christer

-----Original Message-----
From: insipid [mailto:insipid-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Georg Mayer
Sent: 8. kesäkuuta 2015 12:42
To: insipid@ietf.org
Cc: Peter.Dawes@vodafone.com
Subject: [Insipid] Review of draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-02

Hello,

I finally managed to review draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-02. I have no technical comments on it and support all the requirements therein. In my view the draft can progress as is.

Cheers,
Georg


_______________________________________________
insipid mailing list
insipid@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email