Re: [Insipid] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-12: (with COMMENT)

"Dawes, Peter, Vodafone Group" <Peter.Dawes@vodafone.com> Thu, 02 February 2017 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <Peter.Dawes@vodafone.com>
X-Original-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0E1129459; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 06:59:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.355
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.355 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.156] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mgguj_7Ku1lL; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 06:59:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.bemta6.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta6.messagelabs.com [193.109.254.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF5021293E9; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 06:59:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [193.109.255.99] by server-7.bemta-6.messagelabs.com id C9/F3-29440-46943985; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 14:59:48 +0000
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrJKsWRWlGSWpSXmKPExsWi75nTqZviOTn C4N9WdYuj216wWMyd4mcx489EZotHj34wWcy//4zJomFnvgObx5TfG1k9ds66y+6xZMlPpgDm KNbMvKT8igTWjO7ONWwFEyUqmhauYm9gfCHexcjJISSwjVHi7w7mLkYuIPsQo8SzBVOZIJzDj BJHj91lgXA2MUpM/fMDKMPBwSZgLzFjTwxIt4hAsMTxnd2sIDXMAvcZJf5Nf8oKkhAWSJJYfe sbI0RRssSac7eYIWwjiYPbToPZLAIqEpNPrWIHsXkFQiUOrpzPCDJfSMBPYt2xUpAwp4C/RMu vGUwgNqOArMSXxtVgrcwC4hK3nswHi0sICEgs2XOeGcIWlXj5+B8ryBhmAU2J9bv0IcoVJaZ0 P4TaJChxcuYTFojnVSX+rVzENIFRbBaSqbMQumch6Z6FpHsBI8sqRvXi1KKy1CJdQ72kosz0j JLcxMwcXUMDM73c1OLixPTUnMSkYr3k/NxNjMAoZACCHYw7nzsdYpTkYFIS5Z2iNTlCiC8pP6 UyI7E4I76oNCe1+BCjDAeHkgTvM3egnGBRanpqRVpmDjAdwKQlOHiURHgTQdK8xQWJucWZ6RC pU4yKUuK8O0ASAiCJjNI8uDZYCrrEKCslzMsIdIgQT0FqUW5mCar8K0ZxDkYlYd4vIFN4MvNK 4Ka/AlrMBLT45+NJIItLEhFSUg2M3dkOPtdEv05l0pv9PeHMX45f4r/mhR/m/vJeW0CspS3s8 PsPB81Ue4X7bt3W+H799V7+g8e1BYzNeCY2nZAL0+lUl9O9/HKPS27hUTsD5WmPr6xfk+n/4c Op079ePFNLPRQS1MlnI/Tx04or5oZ3Dh4Sv2+QWer0Uum8hozxb2mR/UfbFO88VGIpzkg01GI uKk4EALOaOZM8AwAA
X-Env-Sender: Peter.Dawes@vodafone.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-7.tower-48.messagelabs.com!1486047588!89553602!1
X-Originating-IP: [47.73.108.137]
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 9.1.1; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 14457 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2017 14:59:48 -0000
Received: from vgdpm11vr.vodafone.com (HELO voxe04hw.internal.vodafone.com) (47.73.108.137) by server-7.tower-48.messagelabs.com with AES256-SHA256 encrypted SMTP; 2 Feb 2017 14:59:48 -0000
Received: from VOEXH08W.internal.vodafone.com (47.73.211.206) by edge1.vodafone.com (195.232.244.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 15:59:46 +0100
Received: from VOEXC05W.internal.vodafone.com (145.230.101.25) by VOEXH08W.internal.vodafone.com (47.73.211.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1076.9; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 15:59:46 +0100
Received: from AVOEXC03W.internal.vodafone.com (145.230.15.132) by VOEXC05W.internal.vodafone.com (145.230.101.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.294.0; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 15:59:46 +0100
Received: from VOEXM31W.internal.vodafone.com ([169.254.7.53]) by AVOEXC03W.internal.vodafone.com ([145.230.15.132]) with mapi id 14.03.0294.000; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 15:59:45 +0100
From: "Dawes, Peter, Vodafone Group" <Peter.Dawes@vodafone.com>
To: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-12: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHSfM3D08izgXe000KdNBB8jAq3kaFVz4/w
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 14:59:44 +0000
Message-ID: <4A4F136CBD0E0D44AE1EDE36C4CD9D99C8C7359E@VOEXM31W.internal.vodafone.com>
References: <148598262942.18688.17689106924752475566.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <148598262942.18688.17689106924752475566.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/insipid/QHPRTnga9BkK38M90fYV2X_v_Hk>
Cc: "insipid@ietf.org" <insipid@ietf.org>, "insipid-chairs@ietf.org" <insipid-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs@ietf.org>, "gsalguei@cisco.com" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Insipid] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: insipid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <insipid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/insipid/>
List-Post: <mailto:insipid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 14:59:53 -0000

Hello Kathleen, 
Thanks for the comment, we can ensure that the solution draft is clear that logging agreements between peer operators are for troubleshooting and regression testing purposes.

Regards,
co-authors

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kathleen Moriarty [mailto:Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com]
> Sent: 01 February 2017 20:57
> To: The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs@ietf.org; insipid-chairs@ietf.org;
> gsalguei@cisco.com; insipid@ietf.org
> Subject: Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-
> 12: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-12: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
> paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> In addition to Stephen's questions, I would like to see a little more text in the
> following sentence of the Security Considerations section:
> OLD:
>    If a prior agreement to log
>    sessions exists with the next hop network then the "log me" marker
>    SHOULD NOT be removed.
> NEW: (or something similar that ties this back to requirement 7)
>    If a prior agreement to log
>    sessions, at a debugging or regression testing level for data, exists with the
> next hop network then the "log me" marker
>    SHOULD NOT be removed.
> 
> That requirement only shows up in one place (as far as I could see and I think
> it would be helpful in the security considerations section as it shows the
> limited scope of use besides the "trust domain" (name may be changed?).
> 
> Note that I am balloting No Objection as this is part of the WG's charter (also
> pointed out in the SecDir review).
>