[Insipid] One week LC for draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-26

"Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com> Thu, 11 August 2016 03:50 UTC

Return-Path: <gsalguei@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05EA912D112 for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 20:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.769
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.769 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VLpjh-Wq95Bq for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 20:50:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E47312B056 for <insipid@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 20:50:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=946; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1470887451; x=1472097051; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=8kAtuFHcv/HBS10G8RtGHhrPupvFv0dAKB2esJX3bqo=; b=I8bPYx/HXc2p/U7Ni/xt2LS2M4QFlvUhr5v5iYPpbLT2AwWl8qXvxVHO 2a9kZ/DZJHVJysJBDJIPfwZi+BbKl60Y+QuzLrv2IgwcE3HeZK/lwrT6X 2QRfXfKDkoFCUq8aehb5lpaBnw3mlV1fQF9cQJupyA9AilawEQ4aah0hj A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AgAgBe9atX/4YNJK1dg0WBWbkjgX2GH?= =?us-ascii?q?YFlOBQBAQEBAQEBXRwLhGU6PxIBPkInBA6INsJIAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBHIYqgXiKQYIvBZk8AYE2jV2Ba4RbiH2QKwEeNoN6h0B/AQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,503,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="140065678"
Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 11 Aug 2016 03:50:51 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-018.cisco.com (xch-aln-018.cisco.com [173.36.7.28]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7B3oorE018123 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 11 Aug 2016 03:50:50 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-009.cisco.com (173.36.7.19) by XCH-ALN-018.cisco.com (173.36.7.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 22:50:50 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-009.cisco.com ([173.36.7.19]) by XCH-ALN-009.cisco.com ([173.36.7.19]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 22:50:50 -0500
From: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
To: "insipid@ietf.org" <insipid@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: One week LC for draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-26
Thread-Index: AQHR84OMiAa4fmUbtUmIVKXY3KIV+A==
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 03:50:50 +0000
Message-ID: <13891FC2-AAC9-4FDB-9ADA-0F0ABB7D0C23@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.240.241]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <E27C6A84F204024CA9ABA96146D188DB@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/insipid/TBoDXPAOVdGmv7w_iTPB00Vdpm0>
Cc: "ben@nostrum.com" <ben@nostrum.com>, "Paul Giralt \(pgiralt\)" <pgiralt@cisco.com>
Subject: [Insipid] One week LC for draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-26
X-BeenThere: insipid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <insipid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/insipid/>
List-Post: <mailto:insipid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 03:50:53 -0000

INSIPID WG - 

The definition of communication session in draft-ietf-insipid-session-id references the reader to RFC 7206:

3.  Session Identifier Requirements and Use Cases

   Requirements and use cases for the end-to-end Session Identifier,
   along with a definition of "session identifier" and "communication
   session", can be found in [RFC7206].

There was a comment during Gen-ART review that this should be a normative reference.  The authors and AD are all in agreement this should indeed be a normative reference.  As a result, since RFC 7206 is informative rather than standards track, this has created a downref.  

Thus, as per BCP 97 (RFC 3967), we are initiating a one week Last Call on draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-26 (which now normatively references Informational RFC 7206).  If there are any issues with this change please raise them on the list.

Thanks,

Gonzalo
<chair hat on/>