[Insipid] Ben Campbell's Discuss on draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-12: (with DISCUSS)

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 02 February 2017 06:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: insipid@ietf.org
Delivered-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A83AD127735; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 22:44:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.42.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148601785464.18684.1776016868867703888.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 22:44:14 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/insipid/U3fsU6gmrysdpPae0BmjQygvI7M>
Cc: insipid@ietf.org, insipid-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs@ietf.org, gsalguei@cisco.com
Subject: [Insipid] Ben Campbell's Discuss on draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-12: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: insipid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <insipid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/insipid/>
List-Post: <mailto:insipid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 06:44:15 -0000

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-12: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


Okay, there's 5 obstains, and at this rate may be more by the telechat. I
can take a hint :-) 

This is a discuss-discuss; I want to talk about the recent guidance we've
given people for this sort of thing, and how we should address work items
that were approved well before that guidance was given. Otherwise, I want
to regroup with the authors and working group before progressing this