Re: [Insipid] MUST or SHOULD for Type 4 / 5 UUIDs?

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Thu, 02 June 2016 07:01 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED18B12D119 for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 00:01:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GYzfJT28OFqC for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 00:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg22.ericsson.net (sesbmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAAA412B02D for <insipid@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 00:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-f79486d0000069d0-32-574fd9b60ffa
Received: from ESESSHC014.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.60]) by sesbmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 66.24.27088.6B9DF475; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 09:01:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.154]) by ESESSHC014.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.60]) with mapi id 14.03.0294.000; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 09:01:09 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Paul Giralt <pgiralt@cisco.com>, "insipid@ietf.org" <insipid@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Insipid] MUST or SHOULD for Type 4 / 5 UUIDs?
Thread-Index: AQHRvINQyFCARoSFIEGWdNKLTlrq+Z/V0aEA
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 07:01:09 +0000
Message-ID: <D375B4FE.990A%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
References: <55234C8F-2A40-4B9E-8976-620A00FFEFF8@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <55234C8F-2A40-4B9E-8976-620A00FFEFF8@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.4.160422
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.18]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <5BB871FF83518F469676D815E44BFEB9@ericsson.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprHIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7je62m/7hBt+fm1jMv/+MyeJmw2NG ByaPKb83snosWfKTKYApissmJTUnsyy1SN8ugSvjTdcE9oJNbBWzf/5nbGCcztrFyMkhIWAi 0fH7DpQtJnHh3nq2LkYuDiGBI4wSy99NgnIWM0p8W7GBuYuRg4NNwEKi+582SIOIgJdE567v TCC2sIC1RO+F7WwQcRuJ//emMEPYRhIn328CW8AioCLx+8NzsDivgJXEnHOzwGwhoPpN97Yz gticArYSvTc2gNmMQAd9P7UGbD6zgLjErSfzmSAOFZBYsuc8M4QtKvHy8T+w+aICehJf7s1j hIgrSnx8tY8RoldP4sbUKWwg5zMD3Xl2lw9EWFti2cLXUOcISpyc+YRlAqP4LCTbZiHpnoXQ PQtJ9ywk3QsYWVcxihanFiflphsZ6aUWZSYXF+fn6eWllmxiBMbawS2/DXYwvnzueIhRgINR iYf3QZR/uBBrYllxZe4hRgkOZiURXr0bQCHelMTKqtSi/Pii0pzU4kOM0hwsSuK8/i8Vw4UE 0hNLUrNTUwtSi2CyTBycUg2MfVfeWYX9Lz63VZWRXyPj6pzk6/pxB00Wbl+vwMTj9W0d3+XC nqdyezac6851/Tadk7mwKezuOkb34742L5ql7hxfr5f0S/1yJ09I5uY7N6+9W/N7xcKrJb1z WM+yfbDRz09UNRYoC2T4cjbq5sELkpkP7ryTLg0UjlPWqo9apD1jZcnPfh1HJZbijERDLeai 4kQAetK377ECAAA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/insipid/XFSzQx3Tcz1J3eWWafGuh75pgW8>
Subject: Re: [Insipid] MUST or SHOULD for Type 4 / 5 UUIDs?
X-BeenThere: insipid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <insipid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/insipid/>
List-Post: <mailto:insipid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 07:01:15 -0000

Hi,

Is there a reason we put SHOULD in section 4? Backward compatibility?

Regards,

Christer


On 02/06/16 07:00, "insipid on behalf of Paul Giralt"
<insipid-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of pgiralt@cisco.com> wrote:

>INSIPID WG, 
>
>Ben pointed out that we have an inconsistency in the draft. Section 4
>states that endpoints SHOULD use Type 4 or Type 5 UUIDs when generating a
>Session Identifier, however Section 12 states that Type 4 or 5 MUST be
>used for privacy reasons.
>
>I¹m inclined to change the first to MUST and thereby require that only
>Type 4 or Type 5 UUID¹s be used.
>
>Does anyone have an issue with this change?
>
>-Paul
>
>_______________________________________________
>insipid mailing list
>insipid@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid