[Insipid] WG Last Call Expired: draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs

"Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com> Fri, 16 September 2016 05:33 UTC

Return-Path: <gsalguei@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF5712B0D6 for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 22:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.028
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.028 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t7fYbLOBbjdq for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 22:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5064C12B01F for <insipid@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 22:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6058; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1474004025; x=1475213625; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=h8FFj8A8QrvctZwY9EiZyRtZgU5N3dXdPbZDKF3Q5Yg=; b=MD1H0x2/rsc9qBbW40LqGIkXYHQmi7X5lXFX6/a7JW8zeXFoN3Atgl4o OHpurRq6c/jx1Q4DRqDuBxe9nII2btV2GCy7Asivnzcgm9Js6tW5dNkBu 2TT3SwmoX6C0y022u50NbuJyhfywRP4smw2CdZmFd3eEg/lVKB5EI4hK9 I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AzAQAmg9tX/5FdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgzoBAQEBAR5XfAeNLKYdhQ+CAySFegIcgUE4FAECAQEBAQEBAV4nhGICBCNWEAIBDDsDAgICMBQRAgQBDQWISg6zUoxAAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFwWGMYF5ihgrgi8FiCyHPooDAYYkiTWBboRigzaFYIxfg3oBHjaEanKGCn8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,343,1470700800"; d="scan'208,217";a="151814114"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Sep 2016 05:33:44 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-010.cisco.com (xch-rcd-010.cisco.com [173.37.102.20]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u8G5XifO026424 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 16 Sep 2016 05:33:44 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-009.cisco.com (173.36.7.19) by XCH-RCD-010.cisco.com (173.37.102.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:33:43 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-009.cisco.com ([173.36.7.19]) by XCH-ALN-009.cisco.com ([173.36.7.19]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:33:43 -0500
From: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
To: "Dawes, Peter, Vodafone Group" <Peter.Dawes@vodafone.com>, "Arun Arunachalam (carunach)" <carunach@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: WG Last Call Expired: draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs
Thread-Index: AQHSD9vjNjnZLza6d0WuxBwYQp1I7w==
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 05:33:43 +0000
Message-ID: <C16A68BA-7DC7-45FE-A325-E1F1D679C1EB@cisco.com>
References: <4C52DDE4-07CF-4F5F-8DB7-8CEB51119A6A@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C52DDE4-07CF-4F5F-8DB7-8CEB51119A6A@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.170.134]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C16A68BA7DC745FEA325E1F1D679C1EBciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/insipid/ZLit2TDqrRWQO7sQpto0KA9S3ww>
Cc: "insipid@ietf.org" <insipid@ietf.org>
Subject: [Insipid] WG Last Call Expired: draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs
X-BeenThere: insipid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <insipid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/insipid/>
List-Post: <mailto:insipid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 05:33:47 -0000

Hi -

This concludes the WG LC for draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-07>.  Thanks to all who provided review comments.

I request that the authors please work with reviewers on resolving the pending comments that were raised. Once there is consensus on the necessary edits please publish a new version (-08). I’ll review that version and prepare the shepherd write-up in preparation for publication.

Thanks,

Gonzalo


On Aug 20, 2016, at 1:18 AM, Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei) <gsalguei@cisco.com<mailto:gsalguei@cisco.com>> wrote:

Dear INSIPID Participants,

We have finally completed the Session-ID draft and it is now in the RFC Editor’s queue. It is now time to move forward with the completion of the pending bottlenecked milestones. The first one of these is draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs, which has previously received sufficient review and currently has no pending unaddressed issues.

This message begins a Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-07 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-07), to end on Friday September 9th, 2016. Please post comments and feedback to the insipid@ietf.org list, including just a simple "looks good” if you have read the draft and have no material comments.

I kindly request the authors to please address any WGLC comments in a timely fashion.

It is my hope we can muster the energy for a final push to finish up the two remaining milestones and then close out this WG.

Regards,

Gonzalo (as chair)