Re: [Insipid] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Mon, 13 August 2018 20:49 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F751310B5; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 13:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.878
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.878 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k2LNHKzU_Q7n; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 13:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3E2E1310AF; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 13:48:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Orochi.local (c-73-206-50-7.hsd1.tx.comcast.net [73.206.50.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w7DKmh5o064553 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 13 Aug 2018 15:48:45 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host c-73-206-50-7.hsd1.tx.comcast.net [73.206.50.7] claimed to be Orochi.local
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking@ietf.org, insipid@ietf.org, gsalguei@cisco.com, insipid-chairs@ietf.org
References: <153419287407.25053.6083538589111644157.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <49bf5297-a10f-5bc0-e8bd-f85f4be21b81@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 15:48:43 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <153419287407.25053.6083538589111644157.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------B1C13A03D6434342036FC4EC"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/insipid/bouHIZYVOIiRgcMHnIaC2kBC_zU>
Subject: Re: [Insipid] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: insipid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <insipid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/insipid/>
List-Post: <mailto:insipid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 20:49:08 -0000

On 8/13/18 15:41, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> S 3.6.
>>    
>>    3.6.  Format of Logged Signaling
>>    
>>       The entire SIP message (SIP headers and message body) MUST be logged.
>>       Logging SHOULD use common standard formats such as the SIP CLF
>>       defined in [RFC6873] and Libpcap.  If SIP CLF format is used, the
> Reference for libpcap?
>
>

For the authors' benefit -- you can find useful information about the 
format here: 
https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/application/vnd.tcpdump.pcap

That's probably as close to a stable reference that can be cited for the 
format.

/a