Re: [Insipid] Reviews for INSIPID Session-ID solution draft Version 11

"Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com> Sat, 24 January 2015 00:49 UTC

Return-Path: <paulej@packetizer.com>
X-Original-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506AE1A8961 for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:49:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.012
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.012 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1xXWiFAGYNkg for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:49:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dublin.packetizer.com (dublin.packetizer.com [75.101.130.125]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D1811A8960 for <insipid@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:49:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.20] (cpe-098-027-048-015.nc.res.rr.com [98.27.48.15]) (authenticated bits=0) by dublin.packetizer.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0O0naXr027261 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:49:37 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=packetizer.com; s=dublin; t=1422060577; bh=Sz393TqndsOjsuNc+MmY9PghfR04mc6KTppHDtRIqQI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Reply-To; b=VTZeLj3ZG3PZuGxmi8DjUVfnuv07mqgExO/8fYiHN94vhoCWrLk92A1NxdEY6NQKJ lkKWRmz3jz7fm3Vy0LS9BLHzvThQx+z/63ug/jBzklg53fwSagu+z+7+yNH28qB/Wl 7WKvx++7uNh4dKdv7um/IM1sMYXoa1BNV/Ntog9w=
From: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, insipid@ietf.org
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 00:49:47 +0000
Message-Id: <em73d79643-a12b-4d43-b365-aa62462f26d9@sydney>
In-Reply-To: <54C26EC5.60202@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: eM_Client/6.0.21372.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/insipid/cqvhvE7F26e0ZiF6i8Tkn_mMNDA>
Subject: Re: [Insipid] Reviews for INSIPID Session-ID solution draft Version 11
X-BeenThere: insipid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <insipid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/insipid/>
List-Post: <mailto:insipid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 00:49:41 -0000

OK.  How about this?

"The Session-ID header-value is technically case-INSENSITIVE, but only 
lowercase characters are allowed in the sess-uuid components. Receiving 
entities MUST treat sess-uuid components as case-insensitive and not 
produce an error if an uppercase character is received in a sess-uuid."

Do you have better wording than "component"?  I don't like that, but I 
guess that's clear.  I'm open to suggested changes.

Paul

------ Original Message ------
From: "Paul Kyzivat" <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
To: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>; insipid@ietf.org
Sent: 1/23/2015 10:54:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Insipid] Reviews for INSIPID Session-ID solution draft 
Version 11

>On 1/22/15 11:58 PM, Paul E. Jones wrote:
>>Specifically, how about this at the end of section 5?
>>
>>NOTE: The Session-ID header-value is technically case-INSENSITIVE, but
>>only lowercase characters are allowed in the sess-uuid components of 
>>the
>>syntax.
>
>Its better than nothing. But I think it would be better to make a 
>normative requirement to support reception of uuids in either case, 
>while requiring that they be sent in lower case. This makes it clear 
>that it is only an accommodation to non-conforming implementations.
>
>  Thanks,
>  Paul
>
>>------ Original Message ------
>>From: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
>>To: "Paul Kyzivat" <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>; insipid@ietf.org
>>Sent: 1/22/2015 11:53:48 PM
>>Subject: Re: [Insipid] Reviews for INSIPID Session-ID solution draft
>>Version 11
>>
>>>Paul,
>>>
>>>>>>>I think it would be worth to mention that the UUID is case
>>>>>>>insensitive
>>>>>>>as defined in RFC 4122
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The text currently states that the UUID characters are lower-case. 
>>>>>>The
>>>>>>syntax also enforces this. The RFC 4122 text is funny, because it 
>>>>>>says
>>>>>>"lower case characters and are case insensitive". I don't know 
>>>>>>what
>>>>>>that means, except that "F" is not a valid character. Rather than
>>>>>>create confusing language, I'd rather just leave the text as it is 
>>>>>>in
>>>>>>saying the characters are lowercase.
>>>>>
>>>>>[RJ] OK
>>>>
>>>>The *safest* (belt and suspenders) way of dealing with this would be
>>>>to require that senders always insert lower case, but require that
>>>>receivers properly process either upper/lower case.
>>>>
>>>>IMO it *should* always have been case-insensitive. IIRC the reason 
>>>>it
>>>>isn't that way is because Kaplan was case sensitive and there are
>>>>implementations in the wild that depend on it.
>>>
>>>I just looked at RFC 7239 and found this:
>>>
>>>    NOTE: The sess-id value is technically case-INSENSITIVE, but only
>>>    lowercase characters are allowed.
>>>
>>>Shall we include the same text in our draft?
>>>
>>>Paul
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>insipid mailing list
>>>insipid@ietf.org
>>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>insipid mailing list
>insipid@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid