IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs

"Arun Arunachalam (carunach)" <carunach@cisco.com> Mon, 22 August 2016 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <carunach@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FFBC12D0CF for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.068
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.068 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s5DT4JrNLKFu for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:07:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE52312D144 for <insipid@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:07:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4163; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1471903651; x=1473113251; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=5uhhpQqZHlA9TadVEthp4qIRWwRx9qhXzpxnjJJfqGM=; b=HIZROly/UZag6sw33ECsNgBgAfapXPZDyq4yrcTq7hqCLA6KsOl+BISn eQELBhpKPiex1N5h2MnT/+mbdqBhJwyRd5y3EvPHx4UxFy5H3u/3Nzlkc urMdD2BlaqHpqgwiDNGI5rGNDxIQvDvVc4gOPbfQOvEZFusBz6aYIXM7j Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A+AwAcd7tX/51dJa1dg0RWfAerUYcmhQiBfSSFeQKBaTgUAgEBAQEBAQFeJ4RfAQVuCxACAQgEOwchERQRAgQOBYgXAxcOugINhA4BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXBYgjCIJNgkOCM4J2gi8FlAGFEzQBjFqCRIFtiA+FVIg3hAiDdwEeNoN6cAGFe38BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,562,1464652800"; d="scan'208,217";a="313390493"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Aug 2016 22:07:31 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-012.cisco.com (xch-rcd-012.cisco.com [173.37.102.22]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7MM7U3X003151 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 22 Aug 2016 22:07:30 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-015.cisco.com (173.36.7.25) by XCH-RCD-012.cisco.com (173.37.102.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:07:30 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-015.cisco.com ([173.36.7.25]) by XCH-ALN-015.cisco.com ([173.36.7.25]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:07:30 -0500
From: "Arun Arunachalam (carunach)" <carunach@cisco.com>
To: Alberto Llamas <albertollamaso@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs
Thread-Index: AQHR/MGTkYOEk9rqKkaGJvlHqADyJw==
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 22:07:30 +0000
Message-ID: <901FE941-6579-4694-BFD0-5193F274E688@cisco.com>
References: <CAHH1jkM6aTvDmcjWY4+PziWkYUHpTA_jrAsbaY_4UO0DNaVbQw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHH1jkM6aTvDmcjWY4+PziWkYUHpTA_jrAsbaY_4UO0DNaVbQw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.150.52.105]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_901FE94165794694BFD05193F274E688ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/insipid/eG-knbgc5cXM9b77SzO9DZDbzZU>
Cc: "peter.dawes@vodafone.com" <peter.dawes@vodafone.com>, "insipid@ietf.org" <insipid@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs
X-BeenThere: insipid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <insipid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/insipid/>
List-Post: <mailto:insipid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 22:07:33 -0000

Hi Alberto,

Thanks for the feedback !

I think your suggestion is to carry the log-me marker across an end-to-end session instead of limiting it to per-dialog.

Adding insipid mailing list.

Thanks!
Arun



On Aug 22, 2016, at 3:26 PM, Alberto Llamas <albertollamaso@gmail.com<mailto:albertollamaso@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hello Peter and Chidambaram,

I have read your proposed RFC [https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-07.txt] which I find a very good document.

I believe that in section 5 you should include a requirement for the case when a B2BUA receive a request (A leg INVITE) which contains a "Log Me" marker and this entity generate another INVITE (B leg)  regarding the first one. In this case the "Log me" marker should be preserved when the second INVITE is generated.

A common example is when Diversion exists and then we receive an INVITE back with Diversion, History-info headers..etc...then we MUST be able to treat this new call as part of debugging or regression testing.

Thanks,

--
albert

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email