Re: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-18: comments and questions

"Paul Giralt (pgiralt)" <pgiralt@cisco.com> Sun, 10 April 2016 22:22 UTC

Return-Path: <pgiralt@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB1312D0AC for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 15:22:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.517
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.517 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h7Dy3RCTfZYq for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 15:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5D0A12B01B for <insipid@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 15:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2300; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1460326977; x=1461536577; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=xV4KO93QcabP/ZUfX7wYJ1AvbYtdM3B4daRxUbtqalc=; b=CEpJCN3glbyH0kbT4gmpTUeFMzxtmtL5KUDhaoi3LEeDUdq6d1q0EXPX VKI4WecKIwkO6ypLPMXT6vIbyxmwL8KPVA1AYkyRkFLbXiUhhWH4Q5Ea1 p/m0drQ5RyfADIvPVHht1e3MCMieofsIJkAI1EPn8vomduTpiLuWRwF/L Q=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 842
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DKAgDs0ApX/5FdJa1cgzeBUAa6UA6Bc?= =?us-ascii?q?4YNAoEgOBQBAQEBAQEBZSeEQQEBAQMBI1YFCwIBCBgqAgIyJQEBBA4FDogRCKs?= =?us-ascii?q?KkTMBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQENCIYhgXUIgk6HPyuCKwWTGYRrAYMjg?= =?us-ascii?q?WaJAo8NjyUBHgFDg2dsiS1+AQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,462,1454976000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="92042005"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Apr 2016 22:22:56 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-018.cisco.com (xch-rtp-018.cisco.com [64.101.220.158]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u3AMMuZu025258 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 10 Apr 2016 22:22:56 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-018.cisco.com (64.101.220.158) by XCH-RTP-018.cisco.com (64.101.220.158) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 18:22:55 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-018.cisco.com ([64.101.220.158]) by XCH-RTP-018.cisco.com ([64.101.220.158]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 18:22:55 -0400
From: "Paul Giralt (pgiralt)" <pgiralt@cisco.com>
To: Brett Tate <brett@broadsoft.com>
Thread-Topic: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-18: comments and questions
Thread-Index: AdGKjoY1cNJ5jXYgSYmyGC49bFEmrAFQBpWAABFBvwAAILv4gAASisQAAK4ShAA=
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 22:22:55 +0000
Message-ID: <4F82CEC9-9BF0-4925-859E-2415B9E759B2@cisco.com>
References: <7fe4e490ec6b9eb7b87b288748456e09@mail.gmail.com> <62C9B6F3-488B-4B8F-9657-EA2EA1ADB8DF@cisco.com> <2b172d66af0e89739e1b8ed8285b130f@mail.gmail.com> <D66E5B25-E342-4333-BF71-2404247CFD5A@cisco.com> <2d9383192a8f2f1951b5f2bd7902cc8a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2d9383192a8f2f1951b5f2bd7902cc8a@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.123.196]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4DC0E22A-88EB-4CC7-BC31-75DB251A8835"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/insipid/goMkBePowwG9VuDedWgsSU4E--I>
Cc: "insipid@ietf.org" <insipid@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-18: comments and questions
X-BeenThere: insipid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <insipid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/insipid/>
List-Post: <mailto:insipid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 22:22:59 -0000

Thanks Brett.

I’ll get -20 out tonight.

-Paul

> On Apr 7, 2016, at 7:18 AM, Brett Tate <brett@broadsoft.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for the response; reply is inline.
> 
>> I’ve added similar verbiage to bullet 5 to make it clear
>> but after reading bullet 1 again, I will be removing the
>> statement "(with the exception of ACK or CANCEL as
>> described below)” because there is no response to an ACK
>> anyway, so it doesn’t really make sense and we want bullet
>> 1 to apply to CANCEL as well. I’m not sure I remember why
>> I added that in the first place, but it seems wrong. Let
>> me know if you see any issue with this.
> 
> The change sounds correct.
> 
> 
>> Were you planning on any additional feedback on
>> draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-19?
> 
> No.  However if I find time before or during WGLC, I'll review whatever is
> the current version of the draft.