Re: [Insipid] Working group last call for draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-10

"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <> Sat, 18 October 2014 11:22 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D4DB1A6F98 for <>; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 04:22:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7KSyzklULh4b for <>; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 04:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A14D1A6F84 for <>; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 04:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown []) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id C348781A44269; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 11:22:28 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ( []) by (GMO) with ESMTP id s9IBMV7D000546 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 18 Oct 2014 13:22:31 +0200
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 13:22:31 +0200
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <>
To: Mary Barnes <>
Thread-Topic: [Insipid] Working group last call for draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-10
Thread-Index: AQHP6sTJrRn5kQ6zfk+F4mYre0qNyZw1tUDA
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 11:22:30 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B261BB2FR712WXCHMBA11zeu_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [Insipid] Working group last call for draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-10
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 11:22:36 -0000

Conversely the document has been already well reviewed by a number of members of the working group, so I hope we are looking to catch the few people who might have missed it so far.

Having said that, and this always applies as far as I am concerned, if anyone is planning to review this, but needs more cycles, then they should send a mail to the chairs indicating when they can complete by, and we will address it accordingly.



From: Mary Barnes []
Sent: 18 October 2014 12:15
To: DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
Subject: Re: [Insipid] Working group last call for draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-10

I think a 2 week WGLC, when one of the weeks is the week before the IETF meeting draft deadline is a little short.  Most people are focused on getting their own drafts updated and submitted prior to the draft cutoff and most likely won't be looking for other drafts to read until after the cutoff.


On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 5:32 AM, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) <<>> wrote:
This is a WGLC for draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-10

Please review and provide comments both editorial and technical, preferably to the list directly, by 1st of November 2014.

It is helpful if comments are given some form of grading, so we can quickly identify the showstoppers from the pure editorial (and those inbetween).

If you have comments as a result of this review that you believe will need discussion in Honolulu to resolve, then please attempt to identify those comments early, i.e. within the next few days.



WG cochairs
insipid mailing list<>