[Insipid] Review of draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-02 [[WAS: Re: draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-02.txt: comments]]

Thanks for your review, Jorgen.  I will let Peter, as editor of the document, respond to your review but I am updating the subject since it is misleading as it is a review is for the requirements document and not the ‘logme’ solution document.

Cheers,

Gonzalo
<as chair>

> On May 8, 2015, at 8:31 AM, Jörgen Axell <jorgen.axell@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> In general, I believe this functionality is useful to be able to trace faults in a network. Having a signalling based activation is a simple way to follow the path in a network.  I have a few comments:
> 
> Section 3: I assume the Network A, B, C has no connection to Country A, B, C. Maybe numbers or different letters is clearer.
> 
> REQ-6: I understand that if the SIP proxy marks a response for logging because the UAS did not echo the log-me marker, then it needs to remember that the marker was present in the request. It is harder to understand what the SIP proxy needs to remember if it decides to mark a request that the UA did not mark. Is this rather configuration than remembering something?
> 
> 6.2.1 The text following "Activating a debug mode" contains a number of "it" which I find hard to read. I assume "it" refers to the activation request but I don't think that is clear from the text.
> 
> On the nit side, REQ-1 contains a "log me", which I believe should be "log-me".
> 
> Regards,
> Jörgen
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: insipid [mailto:insipid-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: 27 February 2015 14:21
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: insipid@ietf.org
> Subject: [Insipid] I-D Action: draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-02.txt
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the INtermediary-safe SIP session ID Working Group of the IETF.
> 
>        Title           : Marking SIP Messages to be Logged
>        Author          : Peter Dawes
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-02.txt
> 	Pages           : 14
> 	Date            : 2015-02-27
> 
> Abstract:
>   SIP networks use signalling monitoring tools to diagnose user
>   reported problems and for regression testing if network or user agent
>   software is upgraded.  As networks grow and become interconnected,
>   including connection via transit networks, it becomes impractical to
>   predict the path that SIP signalling will take between user agents,
>   and therefore impractical to monitor SIP signalling end-to-end.
> 
>   This document describes an indicator for the SIP protocol which can
>   be used to mark signalling as of interest to logging.  Such marking
>   will typically be applied as part of network testing controlled by
>   the network operator and not used in regular user agent signalling.
>   However, such marking can be carried end-to-end including the SIP
>   user agents, even if a session originates and terminates in different
>   networks.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking/
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-02
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-02
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> insipid mailing list
> insipid@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid
> 
> _______________________________________________
> insipid mailing list
> insipid@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid