[Insipid] [insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs

"Dawes, Peter, Vodafone Group" <Peter.Dawes@vodafone.com> Wed, 21 January 2015 14:33 UTC

Return-Path: <Peter.Dawes@vodafone.com>
X-Original-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1951A1ABE for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 06:33:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sJKerNf88HIq for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 06:33:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.bemta3.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta3.messagelabs.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E87B1A1ABB for <insipid@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 06:33:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] by server-17.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id A4/1E-07052-8B8BFB45; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:33:28 +0000
X-Env-Sender: Peter.Dawes@vodafone.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-169.messagelabs.com!1421850808!17862321!1
X-Originating-IP: []
X-StarScan-Version: 6.12.5; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 23014 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2015 14:33:28 -0000
Received: from mailout10.vodafone.com (HELO mailout10.vodafone.com) ( by server-14.tower-169.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 21 Jan 2015 14:33:28 -0000
Received: from mailint10.vodafone.com (localhost []) by mailout10.vodafone.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1872B3002DA for <insipid@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:33:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from VOEXC02W.internal.vodafone.com (voexc02w.dc-ratingen.de []) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailint10.vodafone.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 096363002CE; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:33:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from VOEXC12W.internal.vodafone.com ( by VOEXC02W.internal.vodafone.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:33:27 +0100
Received: from VOEXM31W.internal.vodafone.com ([]) by voexc12w.internal.vodafone.com ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0181.006; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:33:26 +0100
From: "Dawes, Peter, Vodafone Group" <Peter.Dawes@vodafone.com>
To: "insipid@ietf.org" <insipid@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs
Thread-Index: AdA1hSiECY2e6CnxRoS9Dnw9sImjXw==
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:33:21 +0000
Message-ID: <4A4F136CBD0E0D44AE1EDE36C4CD9D998A643725@VOEXM31W.internal.vodafone.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4A4F136CBD0E0D44AE1EDE36C4CD9D998A643725VOEXM31Winterna_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/insipid/qG-yTcc2a0w0W0LJJmxCXgxcqZ4>
Cc: "'DRAGE, Keith (Keith) (keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com)'" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>, "'Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei@cisco.com)'" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
Subject: [Insipid] [insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs
X-BeenThere: insipid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <insipid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/insipid/>
List-Post: <mailto:insipid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:33:32 -0000

Hello All,
I have revised the "log me" requirements draft (http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-02.txt) to clean it up and incorporate review comments. The changes are:

a)      Document categorized as Informational (not Standards Track)

b)      Capitalized the RFC 2119 keywords in the requirements and re-titled "Requirements Language" to "Conventions Used in this Document"

c)       Consistent use of "log me" (not log-me, 'log me' etc.) throughout

d)      Figure 1 box edge re-aligned

e)      Section 4 re-titled "Basic Diagnostic Procedure" (was "Skeleton Diagnostic Procedure")

f)       Section 5 REQ8 updated so that Session-ID references both requirements RFC (RFC 7206) and solutions draft (draft-ietf-insipid-session-id)

g)      Introductory text added for Security Considerations section

h)      Section 6.2.1 and 6.2.2 headings capitalized

i)        RFC2234 removed from References as the draft does not use ABNF.

j)        Added an Acknowledgements section

If you have the time, I would welcome any further comments or reviews of the requirements draft.