IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-13

"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Sun, 25 January 2015 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C8B1A86DD for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 13:34:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id soRlY84XSSwz for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 13:34:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpgre-esg-01.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 435C11A7017 for <insipid@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 13:34:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.122]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 94307A73022D2; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 21:34:41 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t0PLYjdb006520 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 25 Jan 2015 22:34:45 +0100
Received: from FR711WXCHMBA04.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.4.199]) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.111]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 22:34:45 +0100
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>, "insipid@ietf.org" <insipid@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-13
Thread-Index: AQHQOAm9DCIaKzWxOkmLmEF+S+WI8JzPlJCAgAAQ97D///kHgIABnzGw
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 21:34:44 +0000
Message-ID: <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B4A0D58C7@FR711WXCHMBA04.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B4A0D55FC@FR711WXCHMBA04.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <em45407f81-06bb-4442-871c-707554d1dd23@sydney>
In-Reply-To: <em45407f81-06bb-4442-871c-707554d1dd23@sydney>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.41]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B4A0D58C7FR711WXCHMBA04z_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/insipid/rQGkQdmuA4vwCDxV04JFJkPD7x8>
Subject: Re: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-13
X-BeenThere: insipid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <insipid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/insipid/>
List-Post: <mailto:insipid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 21:34:50 -0000

So I guess I am looking for responses from Roland J., Paul K, and Brett T. as to whether we now have a version to go forward.

regards

Keith

________________________________
From: Paul E. Jones [mailto:paulej@packetizer.com]
Sent: 24 January 2015 19:55
To: DRAGE, Keith (Keith); insipid@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-13

I think so, but I would like to get positive confirmation from others.

Paul

------ Original Message ------
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>>
To: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com<mailto:paulej@packetizer.com>>; "insipid@ietf.org" <insipid@ietf.org<mailto:insipid@ietf.org>>
Sent: 1/24/2015 2:20:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-13

Apart from this one issue, does this represent closure of all issues that are currently being discussed?

Keith

________________________________
From: insipid [mailto:insipid-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:insipid-bounces@ietf.org>] On Behalf Of Paul E. Jones
Sent: 24 January 2015 19:20
To: Paul E. Jones; insipid@ietf.org<mailto:insipid@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-13

Folks,

I just noted an alignment problem in the figure in 9.8.1.  I'll fix that in my local copy, but will hold off publishing another just for that small issue.

Paul

------ Original Message ------
From: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com<mailto:paulej@packetizer.com>>
To: "insipid@ietf.org<mailto:insipid@ietf.org>" <insipid@ietf.org<mailto:insipid@ietf.org>>
Sent: 1/24/2015 2:12:42 PM
Subject: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-13

Folks,

I submitted draft -13 that contains all of the text changes suggested thus far.  Please let me know if you see any issues in that text.

I believe all (or at least most) of the WGLC comments have been addressed.  If that's not the case, we can continue discussion on the list of course.

The chairs have (for a while I might add) expressed a sense of urgency to move this along.  So, please let the group (and chairs) know if there are other things we need to address or whether we can suggest to send this for publication?

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email