IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Insipid] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-12: (with COMMENT)

"Arun Arunachalam (carunach)" <carunach@cisco.com> Thu, 16 August 2018 14:45 UTC

Return-Path: <carunach@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8151A130E8C; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 07:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id swwtfA-MMjQY; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 07:45:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0051130E8B; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 07:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2340; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1534430717; x=1535640317; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=VKKC2fCSj8HH5srG0ezLyRGJV/MU/c9ItoFhb9dZAmQ=; b=GZjPBVG1Se7iRYuChE/IXZklhhvUR6wbYuLUjfhnzdSYrJUOyS0+z+Lp hba35meUGEz9QG+h81fnA1FUkYp6dP5cqxQytT+96ibsG8aUrPkiWMsam nzaiZ1BILtE2cSvTjrDkqsOhYUDmPucLLRv6KPi6HCD52kTWmKzv2360q I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CLBADDjXVb/5JdJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNPY38oCoNklCOCDYM9klgUgWYLI4RJAheDKSE2FgECAQECAQECbRwMhTcBAQEDASMRRQULAgEIGAICJgICAjAVEAIEDgWDIgGBeQgPqQqBLoQqAYYxBYELiA0XggCBOR+CTIFBgVoCAQIBgSoBEgEfgwExgiYCiAWKNYgzCQKGI4k2DwaBOoQuiEaLCIdyAhEUgSQkByphWBEIcBVlAYI+gjEciA07hT5vAYwVgR+BGwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.53,247,1531785600"; d="scan'208";a="158360409"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Aug 2018 14:45:16 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-009.cisco.com (xch-aln-009.cisco.com [173.36.7.19]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w7GEjGeA004603 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 16 Aug 2018 14:45:16 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-015.cisco.com (173.36.7.25) by XCH-ALN-009.cisco.com (173.36.7.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 09:45:15 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-015.cisco.com ([173.36.7.25]) by XCH-ALN-015.cisco.com ([173.36.7.25]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 09:45:15 -0500
From: "Arun Arunachalam (carunach)" <carunach@cisco.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking@ietf.org>, "insipid-chairs@ietf.org" <insipid-chairs@ietf.org>, "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>, "insipid@ietf.org" <insipid@ietf.org>, "Dawes, Peter, Vodafone Group" <Peter.Dawes@vodafone.com>, "Arun Arunachalam (carunach)" <carunach=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-12: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHUM/gpMuGuDWrF4E6+eUUZoWPS/KTCy1oA
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 14:45:15 +0000
Message-ID: <E3AEB4C8-644E-421B-9A04-4D24E97F774E@cisco.com>
References: <153426939480.27116.8218591880709971920.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <153426939480.27116.8218591880709971920.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.118.58.71]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <B5CEA487B9ECF14592C9AD6BF4F54786@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.19, xch-aln-009.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/insipid/rkJaFOANsoq5TN091m4A_WTT_o0>
Subject: Re: [Insipid] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: insipid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <insipid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/insipid/>
List-Post: <mailto:insipid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 14:45:21 -0000

Thanks Warren!

Please see inline.

> On Aug 14, 2018, at 1:56 PM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
> 
> Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-12: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Thank  you for a clear and well written document.
> 
> A rich version of this review is at:
> 
> Thank you for a clear and well-written document.
> 
> An HTML version of this review is at:
> https://mozphab-ietf.devsvcdev.mozaws.net/D11687
> 
> Line: 124
> I'm uncomfortable with the "operators need to" wording -- perhaps "operators
> often have to", or "operators are often expected to”?

Sure. We will make this change.

> 
> Line: 1555
> The privacy implications of all of this seem large -- I think that it would be
> really useful to make "Privacy" be its own section, and not a subsection of
> Security Considerations.
> 

We plan to make the content under "8.4 Privacy” as a separate section named “Section 9.0 Privacy Considerations”. 

Thanks!
Peter & Arun

>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email