Re: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-13

<> Mon, 26 January 2015 07:02 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5EAC1A1EFF for <>; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 23:02:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.859
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.859 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mUw-b72ptQB2 for <>; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 23:02:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 000A31A1A5B for <>; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 23:02:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP; 26 Jan 2015 08:02:18 +0100
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,467,1418079600"; d="scan'208,217";a="202766598"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 26 Jan 2015 08:02:18 +0100
Received: from ([fe80::c943:1394:e86e:fce3]) by ([fe80::841f:f92c:15ca:8526%16]) with mapi; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 08:02:18 +0100
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 08:02:18 +0100
Thread-Topic: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-13
Thread-Index: AdA4D7frV5O01q4ZQSKUtBv2wz7LNgBJh2mA
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <em45407f81-06bb-4442-871c-707554d1dd23@sydney>
In-Reply-To: <em45407f81-06bb-4442-871c-707554d1dd23@sydney>
Accept-Language: de-DE
Content-Language: de-DE
acceptlanguage: de-DE
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_058CE00BD4D6B94FAD033A2439EA1E4B01E7A2460C9BHE113667eme_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-13
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 07:02:25 -0000

Hi Paul,
I have reviewed the changes and I’m happy with the current status.
From my side we can proceed with publication.

Best Regards


Von: insipid [] Im Auftrag von Paul E. Jones
Gesendet: Samstag, 24. Januar 2015 20:55
An: DRAGE, Keith (Keith);
Betreff: Re: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-13

I think so, but I would like to get positive confirmation from others.


------ Original Message ------
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <<>>
To: "Paul E. Jones" <<>>; "<>" <<>>
Sent: 1/24/2015 2:20:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-13

Apart from this one issue, does this represent closure of all issues that are currently being discussed?


From: insipid [<>] On Behalf Of Paul E. Jones
Sent: 24 January 2015 19:20
To: Paul E. Jones;<>
Subject: Re: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-13

I just noted an alignment problem in the figure in 9.8.1.  I'll fix that in my local copy, but will hold off publishing another just for that small issue.


------ Original Message ------
From: "Paul E. Jones" <<>>
To: "<>" <<>>
Sent: 1/24/2015 2:12:42 PM
Subject: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-13


I submitted draft -13 that contains all of the text changes suggested thus far.  Please let me know if you see any issues in that text.

I believe all (or at least most) of the WGLC comments have been addressed.  If that's not the case, we can continue discussion on the list of course.

The chairs have (for a while I might add) expressed a sense of urgency to move this along.  So, please let the group (and chairs) know if there are other things we need to address or whether we can suggest to send this for publication?