Re: [Int-area] Fw: Continuing IPv10 I-D discussion.

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Fri, 31 March 2017 16:25 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217431296E8 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lhHdS6loTxBj for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:25:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc0:41:216:3eff:fece:1902]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B08A1296DC for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id C191831C7D; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 18:25:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by godin (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 89CDEEC0B59; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 18:24:01 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 11:24:01 -0500
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Cc: int-area@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20170331162401.GA20580@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <D502B93A.74992%lee@asgard.org> <AM4PR0401MB224189BDD22CD327CF280AA3BD340@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1703310806130.30226@uplift.swm.pp.se> <1d67d033-8a0f-c7eb-ae37-ec99f5a34660@kit.edu> <AM4PR0401MB2241FCE296DCD88D7D065520BD370@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <CALx6S35umePtAb-noP_CiXOh9Kf8j00oCVPSevci6EE9fyxTqQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALx6S35umePtAb-noP_CiXOh9Kf8j00oCVPSevci6EE9fyxTqQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial)
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/2bzgwFxmqcTJnmlPjPwVslcI-SU>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Fw: Continuing IPv10 I-D discussion.
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 16:25:59 -0000

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 07:19:07AM -0700,
 Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> wrote 
 a message of 102 lines which said:

> Please provide an implementation so we can evaluate the prospects.

I volunteer for the IPv10 project at the Prague hackathon :-)