Re: [Int-area] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-16: (with COMMENT)

Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Thu, 05 September 2019 04:43 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F771120074; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 21:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.218
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.218 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i0mPBJg0hjan; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 21:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 121B1120033; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 21:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=CEKW+ZZHaNgRfBX2FLsHqnuqY7ApnYgzSBxaXdCZzFE=; b=jtw/2ZzHk3oSPFAjkiGtDuONV EBTRp+4xkY4sfWXyEoZhi6Zh6e+HwmwVUijqRAtz6W4Th5204ULRgdBVJFspMxUlZx/KaC7uEADqA V9ftUW5GKfSqW4+UNBTQQ8RiSugb8PsK/CyEzXzY/OOtAfYfddQvT5hEz8V+ffQYIzfDnWa5o1zCU QgmsWqswEhiYhcZShqf2V7bNv2w5dMz5AvnsYbFlvRIVXCZIGsOXhatKCOSO+UbP2mrkMk7BblU4k DISKP8nLqWPcOLMG0hSF2K2pUpC/8XJFIVA0NHf8GzmuWQdWlavVWlpZNjgHUhXV2TmfxwV6BoWeg QWDttFMcA==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:56063 helo=[192.168.1.10]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1i5jbx-002tpM-8X; Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:43:13 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A3A1AB6F-DBBF-4804-B26E-5DB4DF655441"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR05MB5463B31C7D4F3BBBFEB0B669AEB80@BYAPR05MB5463.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 21:43:08 -0700
Cc: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Joel Halpern <joel.halpern@ericsson.com>, "draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile@ietf.org>, "intarea-chairs@ietf.org" <intarea-chairs@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <2AABCE1C-4847-4EDB-8711-3DD26082FE2E@strayalpha.com>
References: <156751558566.9632.10416223948753711891.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <B7C5DF29-92B2-477B-9C30-F47E338038EE@strayalpha.com> <efabc7c9f72c4cd9a31f56de24669640@boeing.com> <9331E721-F7F8-4C22-9BE4-E266726B3702@gmail.com> <7bfbaf5fa12c4a9bac3e46ece5dfdcde@boeing.com> <0BF34BFA-5F30-4EE1-9F5E-18D9ECA8D424@gmail.com> <CALx6S37xhhS5ezhJu6-HQmftwY9cBzuCxeaW9thTbKBa2hizcw@mail.gmail.com> <4219167a-9375-ec11-95f1-5de8890acf1d@si6networks.com> <CALx6S37Erj9zbsCmtd4N39Ng03NN173U57ZXYXj8-E7JiAMs+w@mail.gmail.com> <cfe383f8-aa02-f468-f5e2-9e4eb71bb4f3@si6networks.com> <BYAPR05MB5463B31C7D4F3BBBFEB0B669AEB80@BYAPR05MB5463.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/2dsSI0HLD4z06ntDeXUwbGqkrAY>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-16: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 04:43:17 -0000


> On Sep 4, 2019, at 10:34 AM, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> wrote:
> 
> If we follow the second path, we will need to figure out what to do with this document. Options are:
> 
> - Abandon it
> - Progress it as it was approved by the IESG and ignoring all contrary opinions
> - Progress it as it was approved by the IESG and add an appendix recording contrary opinions and identifying them as such
> - Progress it as it was approved by the IESG, deleting controversial sections and remaining silent on these issues
> 
> Does anybody see any other options?

You seem to be overlooking:

- progress it as it was approved by the WG and IETF LC and add an appendix recording contrary IESG opinions and identifying them as such
- progress it based on the text I suggested as was agreed by consensus in this discussion and add an appendix recording contrary IESG opinions and identifying them as such

This isn’t an IESG opinion. They get to write those themselves.

Joe