IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] FYI/Feedback for draft-bryant-arch-fwd-layer-ps-00

Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Tue, 24 March 2020 18:07 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FEC63A0E16; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.318
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.318 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v0WDhmqUoTNY; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:07:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B50E63A0DC8; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:07:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=T5quYqBAXm5hFgCS+vSS3ClgSzZ2HlMX5g38gakhyaM=; b=vePnYQaakYbFhLWUCQZkljwsi o25hBL66lY9b6BWc4fHLyWFRQ2+NtqSimRUOHWiEf6/6O5XbDVTfY3sWDcbk3gxtbpH4BwXAGxlkQ RXQ4horRGDZaA42YP58EYPiDSJsOEKDxMzLSnlVvHRWtQQ3r2jy3w9djPq4ow6GrWwXtbgSO0VokZ 0SlC7NdrTEN6IwWnbx2MK40njJguyAXxxZGFgYAgb2rYtzUM1Aqy6geXkUf6SwCny9PFw+CSwfSkB 5ls9jVo4lEBP7XbFSW/nJaIP6GJmJuUqyyuhqWFeqhBXSWm/NxijMGu2U/BMJYaBJN4mCSfqK+azp fiXn5IyLQ==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:51784 helo=[192.168.1.10]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1jGnx1-0017JH-AL; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:07:01 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5C4CB3B8-12DF-4ADB-9414-F107CA2BD848"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <78D0C85B-0D3D-4CFA-8CEB-8B8257CAAA13@fugue.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:06:53 -0700
Cc: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>, "draft-bryant-arch-fwd-layer-ps@ietf.org" <draft-bryant-arch-fwd-layer-ps@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <3FD5C322-68F9-4B5C-B12E-28DB18910AE0@strayalpha.com>
References: <20200324020956.GA28168@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <57A23F79-2686-4A4D-A175-7D33F3D8CCAB@cisco.com> <20200324175226.GB49016@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <78D0C85B-0D3D-4CFA-8CEB-8B8257CAAA13@fugue.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/4CYRhy7yPM6ZsXDPinsF2KcT3FU>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] FYI/Feedback for draft-bryant-arch-fwd-layer-ps-00
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 18:07:22 -0000


> On Mar 24, 2020, at 10:56 AM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
> 
> On Mar 24, 2020, at 1:52 PM, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de <mailto:tte@cs.fau.de>> wrote:
>> But without a longer term architectural track doing work like this
>> in parallel to current WGs, it will be difficult for the IETF to really drive
>> innovation at the network / forwarding layer longer term.
> 
> Is this something we are even competent to do?

By person, sure.

By group, i.e., does INTAREA or any other area, or even (or especially) the IAB, IMO - NO.

Papers like this are great ways to start beer chats or kickstart panel discussions but don’t do much IMO to move the needle forward. What matter are targeted answers, and those aren’t often the result of group-think (see “the Innovator’s Dilemma”*)

Joe

* those who know me, please don’t drop over because I cited a book. ;-)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email