Re: [Int-area] introducing a new IPv4 option [was RE: [BEHAVE] Revealing identity of TCP client connection when sharing IPv4 address]
Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Tue, 05 October 2010 22:46 UTC
Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 80C7A3A7083 for <int-area@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.635
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-102.635 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.036, BAYES_00=-2.599,
USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GeAPQrjIG-yl for
<int-area@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:46:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pw0-f44.google.com (mail-pw0-f44.google.com
[209.85.160.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4F83A6CAB for
<int-area@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:46:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pwi3 with SMTP id 3so2269841pwi.31 for <int-area@ietf.org>;
Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version
:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding
:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
bh=2enR+G9GGIDCCKe/B2yWoU76BeFBztE7r+evpqzRIqU=;
b=JtmZYbIs7TNb5W/aKa/azcb/2/b3PiYRodeyCWTAcdbRIPeV3aGV7kx2gAoDTvyOnD
LaG68jtsJ0oxhjkFgMzhMS9RnKt6vPeOLpvMaVrhSARgedaNG106E98xKmvS4mDbQTPM
wYmiIikRkbroCiG/EgEXSVuKV41BPG8kw4LKQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
b=bgLCyZ9SvQzsvsXncTmbqAKxs6s4k5XKGJn+NAQ1krcwbhmWEql/+XLocXTtxBLC03
4BbnoWMEsKhTFCKxsqbegeVWdA0R5Ca1Nzk4j5pGTytcR8y+NqhtPvDZ/6OxeQkFz65o
aJ+e3ua+Tpjd4boj5zPHpe++kOx9Vu28Y6AgY=
Received: by 10.114.102.11 with SMTP id z11mr4443461wab.20.1286318876938;
Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.224.217] ([209.97.127.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS
id d2sm156976wam.14.2010.10.05.15.47.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0b9001cb64dc$5ec08890$1c4199b0$@com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:47:54 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EAAEC29D-425A-4452-B9FF-DA92435B8010@gmail.com>
References: <0e7b01cb44a2$5454b7a0$fcfe26e0$@com>
<D6417F98-CAE7-49ED-BC86-E1CF834C970E@nokia.com>
<08da01cb4801$774b45a0$65e1d0e0$@com>
<3252C242-4C77-41A6-9EF2-9A90DB1475B5@nokia.com>
<0f6201cb493a$fc270ea0$f4752be0$@com>
<15BA263B-51AE-4F49-AACE-750B2F28A87C@gmail.com>
<0b9001cb64dc$5ec08890$1c4199b0$@com>
To: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: int-area@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Int-area] introducing a new IPv4 option [was RE: [BEHAVE]
Revealing identity of TCP client connection when sharing IPv4 address]
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>,
<mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/int-area>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>,
<mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 22:46:59 -0000
Dan, >>> No. It's very likely only gotten work since the 2004 paper. > > Off list, someone else suggested it had gotten better. So I tested > the top sites from Alexa's list using NMAP, and results were: > > TCP 3-way handshake without IP option: 99% success > TCP 3-way handshake with IP option: 9% success > > NMAP commands, input, and output are at: > http://www.employees.org/~dwing/ipoptions/ > It is much worse. At the IP and Transport level functionality, the IPv4 Internet is essentially frozen somewhere in the 1990's. Sad... Bob
- [Int-area] Revealing identity of TCP client conne… Dan Wing
- Re: [Int-area] [BEHAVE] Revealing identity of TCP… Lars Eggert
- Re: [Int-area] [BEHAVE] Revealing identity of TCP… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Int-area] [BEHAVE] Revealing identity of TCP… Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [Int-area] [BEHAVE] Revealing identity of TCP… Fred Baker
- Re: [Int-area] [BEHAVE] Revealing identity of TCP… Dan Wing
- Re: [Int-area] [BEHAVE] Revealing identity of TCP… Dan Wing
- Re: [Int-area] [BEHAVE] Revealing identity of TCP… Dan Wing
- Re: [Int-area] [BEHAVE] Revealing identity of TCP… Lars Eggert
- Re: [Int-area] [BEHAVE] Revealing identity of TCP… Joe Touch
- Re: [Int-area] [BEHAVE] Revealing identity of TCP… Dan Wing
- Re: [Int-area] [BEHAVE] Revealing identity of TCP… Joe Touch
- Re: [Int-area] [BEHAVE] Revealing identity of TCP… Dan Wing
- Re: [Int-area] [BEHAVE] Revealing identity of TCP… Joe Touch
- Re: [Int-area] [BEHAVE] Revealing identity of TCP… Dan Wing
- Re: [Int-area] [BEHAVE] Revealing identity of TCP… Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [Int-area] [BEHAVE] Revealing identity of TCP… Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [Int-area] [BEHAVE] Revealing identity of TCP… Dan Wing
- Re: [Int-area] [BEHAVE] Revealing identity of TCP… Dan Wing
- Re: [Int-area] [BEHAVE] Revealing identity of TCP… Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [Int-area] [BEHAVE] Revealing identity of TCP… Dan Wing
- [Int-area] introducing a new IPv4 option [was RE:… Dan Wing
- Re: [Int-area] introducing a new IPv4 option [was… Joe Touch
- Re: [Int-area] [BEHAVE] Revealing identity of TCP… Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [Int-area] introducing a new IPv4 option [was… Bob Hinden
- Re: [Int-area] introducing a new IPv4 option [was… Dan Wing
- Re: [Int-area] introducing a new IPv4 option [was… Bob Hinden
- Re: [Int-area] introducing a new IPv4 option [was… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [Int-area] introducing a new IPv4 option [was… Dan Wing
- Re: [Int-area] introducing a new IPv4 option [was… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Int-area] introducing a new IPv4 option [was… Joel Jaeggli