Re: [Int-area] introducing a new IPv4 option [was RE: [BEHAVE] Revealing identity of TCP client connection when sharing IPv4 address]

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Tue, 05 October 2010 22:46 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C7A3A7083 for <int-area@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.635
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.635 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.036, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GeAPQrjIG-yl for <int-area@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:46:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pw0-f44.google.com (mail-pw0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4F83A6CAB for <int-area@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:46:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pwi3 with SMTP id 3so2269841pwi.31 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=2enR+G9GGIDCCKe/B2yWoU76BeFBztE7r+evpqzRIqU=; b=JtmZYbIs7TNb5W/aKa/azcb/2/b3PiYRodeyCWTAcdbRIPeV3aGV7kx2gAoDTvyOnD LaG68jtsJ0oxhjkFgMzhMS9RnKt6vPeOLpvMaVrhSARgedaNG106E98xKmvS4mDbQTPM wYmiIikRkbroCiG/EgEXSVuKV41BPG8kw4LKQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=bgLCyZ9SvQzsvsXncTmbqAKxs6s4k5XKGJn+NAQ1krcwbhmWEql/+XLocXTtxBLC03 4BbnoWMEsKhTFCKxsqbegeVWdA0R5Ca1Nzk4j5pGTytcR8y+NqhtPvDZ/6OxeQkFz65o aJ+e3ua+Tpjd4boj5zPHpe++kOx9Vu28Y6AgY=
Received: by 10.114.102.11 with SMTP id z11mr4443461wab.20.1286318876938; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.224.217] ([209.97.127.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d2sm156976wam.14.2010.10.05.15.47.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0b9001cb64dc$5ec08890$1c4199b0$@com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:47:54 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EAAEC29D-425A-4452-B9FF-DA92435B8010@gmail.com>
References: <0e7b01cb44a2$5454b7a0$fcfe26e0$@com> <D6417F98-CAE7-49ED-BC86-E1CF834C970E@nokia.com> <08da01cb4801$774b45a0$65e1d0e0$@com> <3252C242-4C77-41A6-9EF2-9A90DB1475B5@nokia.com> <0f6201cb493a$fc270ea0$f4752be0$@com> <15BA263B-51AE-4F49-AACE-750B2F28A87C@gmail.com> <0b9001cb64dc$5ec08890$1c4199b0$@com>
To: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: int-area@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Int-area] introducing a new IPv4 option [was RE: [BEHAVE] Revealing identity of TCP client connection when sharing IPv4 address]
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/int-area>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 22:46:59 -0000

Dan,

>>> No.  It's very likely only gotten work since the 2004 paper.
> 
> Off list, someone else suggested it had gotten better.  So I tested 
> the top sites from Alexa's list using NMAP, and results were:
> 
>  TCP 3-way handshake without IP option:  99% success
>  TCP 3-way handshake with IP option:      9% success
> 
> NMAP commands, input, and output are at:
>  http://www.employees.org/~dwing/ipoptions/
> 

It is much worse.  At the IP and Transport level functionality, the IPv4 Internet is essentially frozen somewhere in the 1990's.  Sad...  

Bob