Re: [Int-area] WG Adoption Call: Extended Ping (Xping)

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Sun, 23 April 2017 01:24 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3F1128708; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 18:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7R2nAS5RLTIC; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 18:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D2FA126DFB; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 18:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5626; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1492910664; x=1494120264; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=N+xAiqY2mgJpzy5JeNm3soj8YPLpD3Ha9xFBmPmk5wQ=; b=eWIWqKmILWyT+uFjNmfm5qxtmJjnngWE7M5BhRK/1x/mUNWc2zdLEt7m mrnK6DTUUbjtXecVaRkkb9slsvGIUdEekW5GtDtce6NdJyCUzN39eOuYm +Zc68poiMDq/2GoKOfDEenWsQjE+HmZ2gUuS/XdXDVKBAMRjPt7u2HXke 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C4AQBKAfxY/4MNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1RhgQwHg2CKFZFGkFGFNYIPIQEKhXgCGoNyPxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUWAgEDAQEbBksLEAIBCAQ7AwICAiULFBECBA4FihwOqgmCJosVAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGAWGU4IIC4Jjh10ugjEFkAuGPoZ4AYcWi2+CAIUziiSUGAEfOD5IYxVEEQGEVxyBY3UBiCiBDQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,236,1488844800"; d="scan'208,217";a="234172710"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 23 Apr 2017 01:24:24 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-019.cisco.com (xch-rtp-019.cisco.com [64.101.220.159]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v3N1ONeG012021 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 23 Apr 2017 01:24:24 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) by XCH-RTP-019.cisco.com (64.101.220.159) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 21:24:22 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 21:24:23 -0400
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Wassim Haddad <wassim.haddad@ericsson.com>
CC: "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>, "intarea-chairs@ietf.org" <intarea-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Int-area] WG Adoption Call: Extended Ping (Xping)
Thread-Index: AQHStIHtoQd/vjXhG0GYT7vEH3pJ3qHSerYA
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 01:24:23 +0000
Message-ID: <1DEBF891-EA30-4989-8C24-139F6FEDA7AC@cisco.com>
References: <E3E723B2-1C6B-42D5-B742-0AD400826BFD@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <E3E723B2-1C6B-42D5-B742-0AD400826BFD@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.212.155]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1DEBF891EA3049898C24139F6FEDA7ACciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/4uCI0XRtMyEpUgM506AaTyt1_vw>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] WG Adoption Call: Extended Ping (Xping)
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 01:24:27 -0000

Hi,

This document aims at addressing a real operational problem, describing a very useful approach.

I support its adoption by Int-area.

That said, three comments:

  1.  Given the generally applicable tool it describes, an “Implementation Status” Section [RFC 7942] ought to be included.
  2.  The name “extended ping” and short name “xping” are currently used by other tools and methods. Is this *the* extended ping? Or a different name?
  3.  I send a few comments on the next detail-level to the authors directly.

Thanks!

— Carlos.

On Apr 13, 2017, at 2:15 PM, Wassim Haddad <wassim.haddad@ericsson.com<mailto:wassim.haddad@ericsson.com>> wrote:

Dear all,

We would like to start a WG adoption call for draft-bonica-intarea-eping-04 (“Extended Ping (Xping)”):

https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-bonica-intarea-eping-04.txt

Please indicate your preferences on the mailling list. The deadline is April 28th.


Regards,

Wassim & Juan Carlos




_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@ietf.org<mailto:Int-area@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area