IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] WGLC for draft-ietf-intarea-broadcast-consider

Rolf Winter <rolf.winter@hs-augsburg.de> Fri, 10 March 2017 08:35 UTC

Return-Path: <rolf.winter@hs-augsburg.de>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D161293D9 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:35:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C_Rvg1XJdkpe for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:35:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fly.RZ.HS-Augsburg.DE (fly.RZ.HS-Augsburg.DE [141.82.217.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19B4E126B6D for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:35:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fly.RZ.HS-Augsburg.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F1B1D63B7 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:34:34 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hs-augsburg.de
Received: from fly.RZ.HS-Augsburg.DE ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fly.rz.hs-augsburg.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ipE5INJBLRi3 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:34:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.1.148] (nightswatch.informatik.hs-augsburg.de [141.82.79.79]) by fly.RZ.HS-Augsburg.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA98E1D637E for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:34:32 +0100 (CET)
To: int-area@ietf.org
References: <CAHLBt8305z=iXg-_SOYh_FcqrFA=Vz-9FmfcTo=PnCviKGhPsQ@mail.gmail.com> <015c01d298f8$7cf7ed60$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: Rolf Winter <rolf.winter@hs-augsburg.de>
Organization: Conntac
Message-ID: <597ab5f3-a7c2-478b-e76e-88541bd7a687@hs-augsburg.de>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:35:30 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <015c01d298f8$7cf7ed60$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/7ejKDG2LOyQdryT4fgGGbPs1iRk>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] WGLC for draft-ietf-intarea-broadcast-consider
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:35:37 -0000

Tom,

see inline.

Am 3/9/17 um 6:13 PM schrieb t.petch:
> I wonder if the mix of SHOULD and should is intentional.
>
> And I cannot recall seeing RFC2119 as an Informative Reference before.
>

Will be fixed.

> s.1
> /  entierly/  entirely/

thanks, will be fixed, too.

>
> And I am surprised at the lack of mention of IPv6 which did its bit for
> the planet by eliminating broadcast.


Multicast in many cases is not any better from the perspective of the 
size of the receiver group, which is why this traffic is more sensitive 
to privacy concerns. The document therefore discusses both broadcast and 
multicast. We will update the document, including a section on broadcast 
and multicast properties as suggested by Joe earlier. It should be much 
clearer then.

Thanks,

Rolf

>
> Tom Petch
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Juan Carlos Zuniga" <j.c.zuniga@ieee.org>
> To: <int-area@ietf.org>
> Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 9:09 PM
>
>
>> Dear Int-Area WG,
>>
>> A review of draft-ietf-intarea-broadcast-consider has been published.
> Since
>> there was good support for this document from the beginning and the
> new
>> version addresses the pending comments, we believe it is ready for WG
> Last
>> Call.
>>
>> This email starts an Int-Area WG Last Call on:
>>
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-intarea-broadcast-consider-02
>>
>> Please respond to this email to support the document and/or send
> comments
>> by 2017-03-20.
>>
>> In addition, to satisfy RFC 6702 "Promoting Compliance with
> Intellectual
>> Property Rights (IPR)":
>> Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to
>> draft-ietf-intarea-hostname-practice?
>> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules?
>> (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more details.)
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Juan Carlos Zuniga & Wassim Haddad
>> (Int-Area WG co-chairs)
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Int-area mailing list
>> Int-area@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email