Re: [Int-area] Evaluate impact of MAC address randomization to IP applications

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Wed, 23 September 2020 15:10 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2F63A11AA for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 08:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qxgj36XlBTEL for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 08:10:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A6EA3A11C4 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 08:10:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.46.130] (24-52-251-6.cable.teksavvy.com [24.52.251.6]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E28FFBC; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 15:10:27 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: NetworkRADIUS; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deployingradius.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <1F58FC0A-F952-4417-9510-7434D2403814@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 11:10:26 -0400
Cc: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E7852FDF-B087-4D3C-8812-FA807197A387@deployingradius.com>
References: <A8BB4316-BCAE-4E3C-AC3B-441D2ECB0338@comcast.com> <71B286E5-EAF7-4B66-A637-8EFE061D2451@gmail.com> <0F483D3B-C82B-4D00-8F0E-252CE027AE1C@gmail.com> <4749067E-A5E1-4D22-AF80-744FA4EB8679@cisco.com> <1F58FC0A-F952-4417-9510-7434D2403814@gmail.com>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/7oEetGLdfVZ6Uq71XDkx0fhUJMI>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Evaluate impact of MAC address randomization to IP applications
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 15:10:33 -0000

On Sep 23, 2020, at 11:02 AM, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> These days LANs are huge and I am simply asking about where the IEEE who are the design authority for Ethernet approve of MAC address randomisation?

  It's actively being pursued:

https://www.ieee802.org/11/Reports/rcmtig_update.htm

https://mentor.ieee.org/omniran/dcn/19/omniran-19-0002-00-CQ00-random-mac-impact.pptx

  Alan DeKok.