Re: [Int-area] Continuing IPv10 I-D discussion.

Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com> Thu, 30 March 2017 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3FE129810 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 09:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.136
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.136 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2=0.874, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hotmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3kcwFh8fAzsy for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 09:58:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR01-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092065089.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.65.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCF2B1299BD for <int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 09:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=8r73fjKLOdMonnnIG5b8kkN9bMYEOtvG/jUDm144Ghs=; b=C6o0cbGlw7NfTDYO3EaSPG8uF7+NbFmukc4kWOY/pxmoubKjZv2rtzv6Lve2UynNb6qNJRa9LNTlefgdENnRlNlbhZJ4FwtUnUah0OlSKNPiw//sDq3ou6cbp2NGkP7+AMKaR4w5EqzzaiY/SzkloMhekAw0GwcUlKaVg8q9FBdBc7Cc0e/39LU1idQoPf++4DfTgZsP+BJ0QZX8ooJPUxkfMPpYHvlXqzvv1kwmxXevbt4c0b3HvlYXHwRdtIBOP3eKPxa6H2HwsDO8VSZttzGZGR1Akxyk0ANgBLLvIVRX9Jz76+H9oowr5kIvlaSGJf0XAi8W+SzuiM3bJ97KHA==
Received: from DB5EUR01FT031.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.4.53) by DB5EUR01HT206.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.5.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.977.7; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:58:25 +0000
Received: from AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.152.4.55) by DB5EUR01FT031.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.4.253) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.1005.5 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:58:25 +0000
Received: from AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.165.44.150]) by AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.165.44.150]) with mapi id 15.01.0991.022; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:58:25 +0000
From: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
CC: "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Int-area] Continuing IPv10 I-D discussion.
Thread-Index: AdKpViCv4ucVibQQSyGDqyi2P9NswAAEJZeAAAILVIAAAF1uAAABjubg
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:58:24 +0000
Message-ID: <AM4PR0401MB2241C4028D3990E8BD58BD81BD340@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <AM4PR0401MB2241D42F2FDC359193FD6B80BD340@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <9c0d9f36-7a07-f9a0-c8b9-75ea5bcb7cf2@kit.edu> <20170330160129.GA5508@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <a42f8fdb-1794-d818-00c6-4d57282d47e7@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <a42f8fdb-1794-d818-00c6-4d57282d47e7@isi.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: isi.edu; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;isi.edu; dmarc=none action=none header.from=hotmail.com;
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:3B147D9D72C6901926930BD2A5AAF129E745FF59CB520D6561C31DA00AA923AC; UpperCasedChecksum:CBA3C6BBF56DBF8C0C000612611AB36BA455164B5FD43909E3D4526B94E53275; SizeAsReceived:8274; Count:42
x-tmn: [AJsdlnRdtAAclmmTS5PqjRiFBdLAXo+t]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DB5EUR01HT206; 5:2Aiz4wy3t8KlR8QtVZkspliWedlfHIfk/yZBLz+qwvR0sEddcGKOdk4yFHXcYw5BNrN9IgSaOtFTWf5YLr7MuzucAE2ncAmYClDXOPy28O/INH9doAIE1zV5RQwnyIPz7pyscN41dDCPRMxAoXBAaA==; 24:tuiewatB8uw1No2PkFmTrJcbgT7viDeSNLBLMmJB4QxGjNv3AUgeMTMhmrBMIrDMf7YWC+fWL71Jk/PNYZHFMjTjhXd1+DXpObE698rdKbw=; 7:3hp4ujvScPZCkp+T2HfnA1yW8/AQ7d3z/uNE9bJxzw29kZaBwMKz41Z9JtXKMTo+gAKmPklDrvW0TQqUa/+pWaqV7ZYtIXlkrDflYAy3jpVO9yXe5KENFqm9G/tnVtGEBoUGX9sk+BCyDDl5dg5nHinbTmkh7MjEiZk/L3K53cl6P99r+X6j1+jPbwezEPILfcqAzF4MXmQOY0AVbQ8gxJsj/0sIx79et2ZPWxEDpTkVoYqpJZnB/gNbcPhZNdwaArqgJOPMdSexG1qk8hxByo4/a53VwaYhX7ZW9Y3gMRwtmQcKjsuLKiJkw8L4nBTe
x-incomingheadercount: 42
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-forefront-antispam-report: EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070007)(98901004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:DB5EUR01HT206; H:AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 07d85004-d58a-4f4e-eff3-08d4778dfb06
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(201702061074)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031322274)(1603101448)(1601125374)(1701031045); SRVR:DB5EUR01HT206;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(444000031); SRVR:DB5EUR01HT206; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DB5EUR01HT206;
x-forefront-prvs: 02622CEF0A
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_AM4PR0401MB2241C4028D3990E8BD58BD81BD340AM4PR0401MB2241_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 30 Mar 2017 16:58:25.0031 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB5EUR01HT206
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/7sw3pgO-DtJXVyYmYxiaqHYNTPA>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Continuing IPv10 I-D discussion.
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:58:30 -0000


From: Int-area [mailto:int-area-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Joe Touch
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 6:12 PM
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer; Bless, Roland (TM)
Cc: int-area@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Continuing IPv10 I-D discussion.


>Indeed, it has been said several times to the author but he keeps not

listening. I wonder why there was a slot at the IETF meeting.



Maybe the IETF should fix that or that will be a waste of time for all.

On 3/30/2017 9:01 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:

- As others already pointed out:

Indeed, it has been said several times to the author but he keeps not

listening. I wonder why there was a slot at the IETF meeting.
The IETF is a place that lets a thousand flowers bloom, but has historically been less adept at pruning.

A good garden requires both. IMO, that's a lesson for the evaluation of all proposals.

Joe