Re: [Int-area] Dear intarea chairs: int-area time planning
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 12 March 2021 23:19 UTC
Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EFF83A046B for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:19:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id djo1rKHhd3Qe for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:19:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk1-x735.google.com (mail-qk1-x735.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::735]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64EB03A044A for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:19:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk1-x735.google.com with SMTP id g185so26120735qkf.6 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:19:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=i7Z5TNHg+F82zGOzaLsxjVo3I+VWZ6b4mvTC4vPgieo=; b=wfQ+311F35u31+VtM1RIq1v0WVK7i2SdsGPr8pu5JbEc0kc6+QGhRIOzr1JjolsGMC 3xbVLtvoxJkjaiOTt2agvwNHNECEnWMFVL/GI5q/nFZNhK1Xyr4wxpSZ02+uHbiuBlUS guUjEy1XuR5sSAcXi0A7TefWCZuUKfW5pcsKetQjSMXVVICtKYuBlLsRJPRDIIL2u6Ls XJTTcc+C+fakvcHqOaZjavyekZwgLqH4aobt2wHMj095VKpoU+lp+J1SSMpvsjHnCkym lhwI9ckjF/lW/oYxZS+QPce2m9b6s0UOrtgpGxWe3vXw4n5QOxPpH15/Mwm9W9tcI3hb 2kcg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=i7Z5TNHg+F82zGOzaLsxjVo3I+VWZ6b4mvTC4vPgieo=; b=L0qrxEjDfpsLUNMZq0FrJuXSr/Ye1sb1jzhBhPoaZz5cQxC8JifsXlxVk39Hj1NST0 nhK1zxZlkGmicxR1+n8L2DoGG/cwFw1f6DbDhukMkwGr65f1QWXP1umVj98S4uIH55Kc sYMzaLCVSHr2yW1+JBdCxG0MVPQNLiKpP9qcNSzaDjXMf+jpbCGoJbsXFBSQ6V+YHHKj wegAKEPCDS3lB7UpCYU0zTpRbWOR3kIBKgoXBQtgagv9mpd0vhW88DOVz5ARKfmbi2V/ nLF2Z9pKelblBnkZPn5ns7KWGeL7brlfX9nSt4UHkwYImUJOTIh3l4pjeH24xjgETb6O ngXQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533+BJv/ooVZgPLRNdFbPZD35awUj3hrsV0w2bUWPaivYJgioOD7 5HzkCMdzRt6LUlZDpb38OToLew==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz7IDtdxt39/q7MXCA1Xvv2oidEy60y9svEZL6SESiEzavFvdCkW/qYczcZ+pDiFrZOBlw6Cw==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:bd7:: with SMTP id 206mr15877630qkl.284.1615591146469; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:19:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-24-91-177-160.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.91.177.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b22sm5589119qkk.45.2021.03.12.15.19.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:19:06 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <8E779760-809B-4C1D-B4D7-1064678DCBD3@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0B9B9252-9139-4121-9EAD-626803C0D4CC"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.33\))
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 18:19:05 -0500
In-Reply-To: <DB7PR08MB31796C701AB2F45DA7AA7CEC896F9@DB7PR08MB3179.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, "intarea-chairs@ietf.org" <intarea-chairs@ietf.org>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
To: Juan Carlos Zuniga <juancarlos.zuniga@sigfox.com>
References: <20210312155546.GA24941@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <DB7PR08MB31796C701AB2F45DA7AA7CEC896F9@DB7PR08MB3179.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.33)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/DRpSjAu7MgS4mNAgwiTsE4EDc_s>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Dear intarea chairs: int-area time planning
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 23:19:11 -0000
On Mar 12, 2021, at 6:13 PM, Juan Carlos Zuniga <juancarlos.zuniga@sigfox.com> wrote: > We have had multiple issues trying to accommodate late requests (arriving after we have already requested the time slot to the IETF meeting planners). However, we will try to avoid this trend and will request a longer slot for the next time. I kind of like Fred Baker’s policy on this: if you haven’t brought it up on the mailing list and gotten some discussion, it’s not going on the agenda. There’s always the next IETF.
- [Int-area] Dear intarea chairs: int-area time pla… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Int-area] Dear intarea chairs: int-area time… Juan Carlos Zuniga
- Re: [Int-area] Dear intarea chairs: int-area time… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Int-area] Dear intarea chairs: int-area time… Wassim Haddad