IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] Logging Recommendations for Internet-Facing Servers

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Tue, 17 June 2014 20:28 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC21A1A0169 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:28:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.251
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aCXlz5Px_Hec for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:28:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from darkstar.isi.edu (darkstar.isi.edu [128.9.128.127]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 086A81A0166 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:28:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.160.166] (abc.isi.edu [128.9.160.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by darkstar.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s5HKR9F2020210 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:27:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53A0A49D.9040202@isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:27:09 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>, Juan-Carlos Zúñiga <JuanCarlos.Zuniga@InterDigital.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20140616024123.0ba53310@elandnews.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330018425@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <8292A630AF4BC647B64BBD509738820909462E3F@GAALPA1MSGUSRAF.ITServices.sbc.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20140617112211.0bb1a980@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20140617112211.0bb1a980@elandnews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/DwtBFEsZeDLbqm7I3E5nUYO36iM
Cc: Scott Sheppard <Scott.Sheppard@att.com>, int-area@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Logging Recommendations for Internet-Facing Servers
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:28:17 -0000


On 6/17/2014 11:58 AM, S Moonesamy wrote:
...
> Some persons raised concerns about those hums.

Hums aren't votes. It might represent those in attendance - but not
everyone attends meetings in general or plenaries in specific.

The key to understanding a BCP is its 2119-language. Because there
wasn't any in RFC 7258 (2119 isn't even cited), there was nothing to 
really object to.

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email