IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] [homenet] [Captive-portals] [EXTERNAL] Re: Evaluate impact of MAC address randomization to IP applications

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 23 September 2020 01:26 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E0E3A09E7; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lHvybV6yo-ip; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:26:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 900DB3A09E3; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 837D4389A4; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 21:04:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id hCRUuydv_Gl7; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 21:04:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:103c:9eff:fecb:2eac]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0155389A3; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 21:04:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364074F5; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 21:25:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, "Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@comcast.com>, "captive-portals@ietf.org" <captive-portals@ietf.org>, "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <29901277-6da1-46fc-b244-ca289005841d@www.fastmail.com>
References: <20200922201317.097C3389D4@tuna.sandelman.ca> <15660.1600807202@localhost> <902400f2-9172-9581-25ab-59ad08e67bee@cs.tcd.ie> <D81695FF-973F-472D-BC0A-9B0F57278B21@comcast.com> <ca575a6b-987e-d998-2713-91e45190f5ea@cs.tcd.ie> <0A436777-D9CE-4A4C-BE45-C8C2CAB9FBF6@comcast.com> <29901277-6da1-46fc-b244-ca289005841d@www.fastmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 21:25:59 -0400
Message-ID: <14884.1600824359@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/EdWSjBLDTineOSPKC_V7r6UYBm0>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] [homenet] [Captive-portals] [EXTERNAL] Re: Evaluate impact of MAC address randomization to IP applications
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 01:26:28 -0000

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:
    > Maybe that is out of scope for your draft, but it shouldn't be out of
    > scope for a group that attempts to look more closely at providing
    > advice for dealing with these features.

    > (Does this thread really need to be cross-posted so widely?  Can we decide on a single venue?)

Blame me :-)
It's only three lists.
It's not like I CC'ed to ADD, emailcore and the dns* groups :-)

I didn't think that Yiu's post to int-area would catch all the right flies.
Apparently it might get a BOF ML soon.

and I felt that it deserved wider review and excitement.
Our mailman strips off Reply-To: since we did that DMARC avoidant hack
(AFAIK), so redirecting replies only works if we all agree.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email